Chris_Halkides
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2009
- Messages
- 12,981
some testimony from Joy Kuhl
Kuhl had devised an antibody test for hemoglobin F that was criticized for its lack of specificity. Here is an excerpt from some of her testimony:
Q: 'What about the real thing? What about the actual electrophoresis plates that you ended up with at the end of your tests? Do you produce those?'
A: 'No.'
Q: 'What about the actual Ouchterlony plates that you ended up with at the end of your tests? Do you produce those?'
A: 'No.'
Q: 'What about the actual gradient gel that you used in your tests? Do you produce that?'
A: 'No.'
Q: 'What about the plate that you used for attempt at a haptoglobin grouping? Do you produce that?'
A: 'No.'
Q: 'They are in Sydney, are they?'
A: 'No...'
Q: 'Where are they?'
A: 'They have been destroyed.'
Q: 'The plates are destroyed?'
A: 'Yes.'
Q: 'All of them?'
A: 'All of them.'
Q: 'Whose decision was that? Who is to take responsibility for this?'
A: 'I don't see it as anyone's responsibility. It is standard procedure in our laboratory.'
Q: 'Did you take any photographs of them? Or did you direct that any photographs be taken of this evidence, before you destroyed it?’
A: 'No. We have not the facilities for that....'
Q: 'Now, at the inquest, did you swear this? "Human fetal hemoglobin is different from adult hemoglobin. While a baby, or a fetus, is in uterus it does not have any adult hemoglobin.”'
A: 'Yes, I did.'
Q: 'That was demonstrably false.'
A: 'I used that statement for the - for purposes of making things clear and simple. It was not a false statement.'
Q: 'I say false in the sense of incorrect?'
A: 'It was incorrect, scientifically. It was used as an indication of the relative amounts.'
Q: 'You are perfectly entitled to give any explanation which you have, but the fact is, scientifically that statement is utterly incorrect.'
A: 'Scientifically, it is not correct. Yes...'
Kuhl had devised an antibody test for hemoglobin F that was criticized for its lack of specificity. Here is an excerpt from some of her testimony:
Q: 'What about the real thing? What about the actual electrophoresis plates that you ended up with at the end of your tests? Do you produce those?'
A: 'No.'
Q: 'What about the actual Ouchterlony plates that you ended up with at the end of your tests? Do you produce those?'
A: 'No.'
Q: 'What about the actual gradient gel that you used in your tests? Do you produce that?'
A: 'No.'
Q: 'What about the plate that you used for attempt at a haptoglobin grouping? Do you produce that?'
A: 'No.'
Q: 'They are in Sydney, are they?'
A: 'No...'
Q: 'Where are they?'
A: 'They have been destroyed.'
Q: 'The plates are destroyed?'
A: 'Yes.'
Q: 'All of them?'
A: 'All of them.'
Q: 'Whose decision was that? Who is to take responsibility for this?'
A: 'I don't see it as anyone's responsibility. It is standard procedure in our laboratory.'
Q: 'Did you take any photographs of them? Or did you direct that any photographs be taken of this evidence, before you destroyed it?’
A: 'No. We have not the facilities for that....'
Q: 'Now, at the inquest, did you swear this? "Human fetal hemoglobin is different from adult hemoglobin. While a baby, or a fetus, is in uterus it does not have any adult hemoglobin.”'
A: 'Yes, I did.'
Q: 'That was demonstrably false.'
A: 'I used that statement for the - for purposes of making things clear and simple. It was not a false statement.'
Q: 'I say false in the sense of incorrect?'
A: 'It was incorrect, scientifically. It was used as an indication of the relative amounts.'
Q: 'You are perfectly entitled to give any explanation which you have, but the fact is, scientifically that statement is utterly incorrect.'
A: 'Scientifically, it is not correct. Yes...'
