Are all Trump supporters racists?

He made wide-brush comments about latinos in the US, suggested banning Muslims from entering the country, has been sued for preventing black people from renting his properties, and has surrounded himself with racists in his cabinet, one of which is a prominent alt-right figure.

What conclusion would you reach?
That you're on the far left if you believe all that?

Saying he has surrounded himself with "racists" is just far left propaganda.
 
But again, what does that have to do with anything? The fact remains that Trump called an American judge unqualified because he apparently believed that a Mexican could not be a fair judge, and because he erroneously conflated a Mexican background with being Mexican. Calling a judge unqualified to do his job is not just talking about him. It's a declaration that his ability to do his job is inferior to what it should be. Whether that's technically racist or just ethnic bias is a quibble.

It's not surprising you can't understand this. Its because you're coming to it thinking there's a racist around every corner.

it looks like this judge had issues with Trump because of his biases.
 
It doesn't matter what "race" means to an anthropologist. If DJT thinks of Mexicans as a race, then discriminating against them or denigrating a stereotype of them would be "racist." He has done both.

No, no, that is my point, he never looked at this as a race issue, that is what your side is doing. Happy to help you stumble onto the correct side.
 
A. "Trump isn't racist because Mexican isn't a race."

B. "So you admit that Trump is Mexicanist. What shall we call that then?"

A. "Look, he's building a wall, okay? He's building a wall. And the judge is of Mexican heritage. He's building a wall."

Trump says the Chinese are manipulating money, should we call it Chinism.
 
Also because racism is purely, simply, and only thinking your race is superior to any others; and the only way to prove someone thinks that is if they say "hey, I think my race is superior to any others." Trump has never said this, therefore nothing else counts- QED, bite me, leftists!

(It must be comforting to live in a world that's so simply seen)

I personally don't have any problem with saying Trump's a bigot instead of a racist, if that's any better for his supporters.

You're upset that you can't accuse and label him a racist because you simply have zero proof of him being a racist? But you'll settle for bigot? Hilarious!
 
I dont see where you read that I do not consider it "big deal", but we all know that you live in your own reality anyway
Lol

Here is more of your reality. The left doesn't seem to realize how bad they lost. When most lose this badly they reflect on what they might change to get folks to vote for them. ;)
 
You're upset that you can't accuse and label him a racist because you simply have zero proof of him being a racist? But you'll settle for bigot? Hilarious!

I'll settle for "bigot" instead? Dear lord, logger- read the post again, and this time, try to get the point being made instead of just the one you want to get.

"Hilarious" is right :rolleyes:
 
It's not surprising you can't understand this. Its because you're coming to it thinking there's a racist around every corner.

it looks like this judge had issues with Trump because of his biases.

Citation needed.

What statements or rulings do you base that assertion on?
 
Nope, sorry. Your conclusion is not supported by the reasoning provided.

One can participate in social organizations related to one's own heritage and also not be biased in their professional judgments.

If you want to make the case that someone will make biased judgments against another who has disparaged their cultural heritage, you should probably find evidence of them making biased judgments against people who have disparaged their cultural heritage.

I see, so if you are a Black man and must have a case heard by a Judge that is also a member of the K-K-K, you'll receive a fair decision as his affiliation with that group would have no bearing or personal bias....Certainly......uh huh.
Chris B.
 
I see, so if you are a Black man and must have a case heard by a Judge that is also a member of the K-K-K, you'll receive a fair decision as his affiliation with that group would have no bearing or personal bias....Certainly......uh huh.
Chris B.

Are you equating being a member of the KKK ( a choice ) to being a member of an ethnic group (not a choice)?

Also, it's pretty apparent what a member of the KKK believes about certain topics, ie race and religion. The same cannot be said of ethnic groups. People in the KKK join the group because they believe in the things the KKK espouses.
 
Last edited:
It's not surprising you can't understand this. Its because you're coming to it thinking there's a racist around every corner.

it looks like this judge had issues with Trump because of his biases.
Maybe you could elaborate on this. At least one of the sources I've read suggests that Trump was simply misinformed about the judge''s affiliations. A judge is disqualified under certain circumstances, but not, generally (at least not usually yet) for abstract reasons such as race, ethnicity, political affiliation, sex, and so forth. What you continue to suggest is that in this specific case a judge's alleged sympathies and affiliations in areas entirely unrelated to the case in hand disqualify him from doing his sworn duty, and that, in this case, the issue is that a person of Mexican heritage and, presumably pro-Mexican sympathies cannot be qualified to judge the Trump University issue, because his Mexican sympathies make him a bad judge.
 
That you're on the far left if you believe all that?

This comment just smacks of ideology. Apparently no one can ever disagree with you without being on the "far left", which I despise, by the way.

How about you instead address the things I listed and why you think they're wrong?

Saying he has surrounded himself with "racists" is just far left propaganda.

I didn't say they were all racists. But the racists on the team sure surround him. Just because the far left calls everybody "racist" without cause doesn't mean racists don't exist, you know?
 

Back
Top Bottom