Brilliant Light Power Going To Market - Free Energy Generator

[jaydeehess]

And frankly if he REALLY had such an object, he could revolutionize the world of heating house overnight. He would not need "research" "tweaking" or whatnot. An object being able to generate so much energy, for nearly no money, would be an insta success.

Now ask yourself why he does not do that...

At the proposed $600 per unit I would gladly buy one of these to both power and heat my house, and supply heat to the hot water tank.
$600 represents less than two months of my winter heating costs. Using new modern hot water baseboard radiators I would estimate total cost of conversion to be around $5K-7K. Pay back period of 3-4 years is VERY acceptable.

I wish it worked.

 

[jaydeehess]

Yes, it will.

Then, we'll get a bank of excuses why the tech STILL hasn't been brought to market, probably focused on the solar panel manufacturers.

Shouldn't take 12 months:

Excuses will need to start a fair margin before 12 months.

Well we have assurances that at least one excuse will not materilize.:

That doesn't answer my question.

I asked for assurance that this model will not suffer the same fate as the last, that promised increased power o/p of yet a newer model will not see this present model production cancelled.

Oh well, you have my assurances then.

 

[halleyscomet]

Oh well, you have my assurances then.

If this tech works, why isn't it being sold as-is for home and water heating?

I'm genuinely confused as to why they wouldn't be raking in cash and funding the next round of development selling this for home and water heating now.

My home uses forced-air heat powered by natural gas. Even if it costs me a grand to have the old heater removed and this device installed in its place, I'd STILL recover my costs within a year. One bad winter and the device would have paid for itself.

What is their excuse for not having monetized the current technology?

 

[Andy_Ross]

If this tech works, why isn't it being sold as-is for home and water heating?

I'm genuinely confused as to why they wouldn't be raking in cash and funding the next round of development selling this for home and water heating now.

My home uses forced-air heat powered by natural gas. Even if it costs me a grand to have the old heater removed and this device installed in its place, I'd STILL recover my costs within a year. One bad winter and the device would have paid for itself.

What is their excuse for not having monetized the current technology?

He wants to build a better one?
It doesn’t exist?

 

[marplots]

You people are way too skeptical.

 

[jaydeehess]

You people are way too skeptical.

I'm not completely sure that Micheal isn't Mills himself.

 

[marplots]

I'm not completely sure that Micheal isn't Mills himself.

This would be a good place to hone your pitch. Work the bugs out before that presentation to Mr. Trump.

 

[halleyscomet]

He wants to build a better one?

That's the thing. All the marketing makes it sound like the heat generating component has been fully functional for years. That's the part they need working to start making MAJOR money.

For a fraction of the effort they're wasting on the solar panel option they could develop housings so these could be drop-in replacements for a wide variety of devices. You could literally shut down a nuclear reactor and shove a big one of these in place of the reactor core. It would take some clever engineering to re-route everything. Ultimately you'd be replacing one heat source for another, much more compact, heat source.

If what they say works ACTUALLY WORKS then they are ALREADY in position to revolutionize energy generation NOW.

It doesn’t exist?

That's the most likely explanation. The alternatives are it works, but the company is run by morons, or it works, but the waste gas is so toxic CHINA won't implement the tech.

 

[jaydeehess]

This would be a good place to hone your pitch. Work the bugs out before that presentation to Mr. Trump.

Why would I bother?

 

[halleyscomet]

This would be a good place to hone your pitch. Work the bugs out before that presentation to Mr. Trump.

Right. Trump is going to finance a technology that, if it worked, would put ANOTHER nail in the coffin of coal.

Well, if he got part ownership I'm sure he'd pour tax dollars into it...

 

[Horatius]

If it worked, this thing would be the ultimate boon for deep space and Mars and lunar surface missions. Massive amounts of power for VASIMR-type engines, no ionizing radiation, plenty of extra heat after running it through Stirling engines.

I wish it worked.

Imagine what we could do if we hooked one of these up to an EMdrive!

 

[marplots]

Why would I bother?

General you, not you.

Right. Trump is going to finance a technology that, if it worked, would put ANOTHER nail in the coffin of coal.

Well, if he got part ownership I'm sure he'd pour tax dollars into it...

The meandering mind of Mr. Trump cannot be plumbed by mere mortals like us. He's at least five (5) steps ahead at all times. Stumbling missteps, sure, but that only makes him more inscrutable.

 

[phunk]

So yeah, I figure a BWM parked in neutral revving is engines is going to dump about as much heat as Mills generator - ball park.

Which would destroy the engine when it overheated. And that's an engine with active cooling systems. How does his little generator with no moving parts not meltdown?

The whole point of this exercise was to show that the world would not melt

But the generator would.

 

[jaydeehess]

General you, not you.

Ahh, good. I am a little too poor to travel to Washington (or NYC) to stump a proposal to Trump.

The meandering mind of Mr. Trump cannot be plumbed by mere mortals like us. He's at least five (5) steps ahead at all times. Stumbling missteps, sure, but that only makes him more inscrutable.

That's true.

 

[aleCcowaN]

Look, at International Skeptics Forum they are saying it may work!

michaelsuede's mission accomplished

 

[halleyscomet]

So yeah, I figure a BWM parked in neutral revving is engines is going to dump about as much heat as Mills generator - ball park.

You're going to need a bigger ball park.


via Imgflip Meme Generator


via Imgflip Meme Generator

 

[jaydeehess]

Look, at International Skeptics Forum they are saying it may work!

michaelsuede's mission accomplished

What?? Where?

 

[aleCcowaN]

What?? Where?

Over there!

"I wish it worked"
"I wish it works"

by Trump-voter epistemology it means "it may work" and that's a fair description of this thread: they're talking about it so it is worth.

Why do you think michaelsuede's add posts at intervals and kept this thread accumulating more than 200 posts a day?

 

[jaydeehess]

Over there!

"I wish it worked"
"I wish it works"

That's what I thought you meant.

 

[Giordano]

...and the problem isn't global warming but simply the management of vast quantities of waste heat. And the objection that the so-called waste heat from the generator is the most easily accessible source of energy. Putting solar cells round a light bulb. Sheesh!

Exactly! One can extract 5 to 10% of the energy released (the numbers keep changing don't they, but why not- they are just made up out of whole cloth anyway) with fancy solar cells and create a complex circulating cooling system to transfer and dump the remaining 90 to 95% of the energy outside as waste heat, as proposed. Or one can capture more than 50% of the waste heat in the circulating system and also turn it into electric power using well established technology. In fact, why just avoid the solar cells altogether? It is almost as if the solar cells are there only to add yet more glamour to the proposal and to serve as an excuse for another broken promise.