Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2003
- Messages
- 64,374
So is "Crooked Hillary".
Yes, it is lame. And?
Need a safe space?
Nope. I would like better comedy, though.
So is "Crooked Hillary".
Need a safe space?
Sure, it's "legitimate". It's just lame.
Why WW3?
Turkey is going to use this to clamp down on terrorists to pacify Russia (ie anyone not agreeing with Erdogan) and Putin will use this to take revenge on terrorists in Syria (ie anyone not agreeing with Assad). And the US can't act against this as both countries are clearly supporting the war against terror.
Everyone wins.
You have that backwards. This would be an anti-Assad terrorist, killing the Russian ambassador because Russia is helping Assad kill civilians in Aleppo. And Turkey is on the other side of that conflict: they support (some of) the Syrian rebels against Assad. I doubt this will lead to direct war, but it absolutely will increase tension, and could spill over into more proxy conflict.
You think Drumpf will commit troops? Wouldn't shock me but I think his M.O. will be to look the other way as Putin runs ruffshod over the planet.
Probably WW3. I'm sure Trump is in contact with his master right now, getting his marching orders.
Will it be direct involvement - or simply turning around while Russia makes mincemeat out of Turkey?
How Trump tells it:
“Today we offer our condolences to the family and loved ones of Russian Ambassador to Turkey Andrei Karlov, who was assassinated by a radical Islamic terrorist," Trump said in a statement.
To state what should be obvious, not all who say Allahu Akbar are terrorists. But we are dealing with a non reflective man who sprays volleys from th hip.
http://thehill.com/homenews/news/311106-trump-condemns-assassination-of-russias-ambassador-to-turkey
I'm not looking to float any conspiracy theories, or even speculate about same, but I would still note that it would be a radical terrorist act as long as the assassination wasn't state-sponsored. Different descriptors would apply if it was.I would say it's pretty radical and terroristic to assassinate an Ambassador.
How important do you have to be for your murder to be called assassination?I would say it's pretty radical and terroristic to assassinate an Ambassador.
I would say it's pretty radical and terroristic to assassinate an Ambassador.
Aside from the fact that he was recorded invoking the Islamic deity, and making common cause with the anti-Assad revolutionaries in Iraq, you mean.Key word I ommited was Islamic. Islamic terrorist action is an unevidence characterization at this point.
Within an hour of the assassination, various meme creators made memes about the incident using the famous photograph. Tacky, in my opinion.