Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Big Dog said:
see that highlighted sentence. What skeptic is going to be the first to figure out the massive flaw in his reasoning.

C'mon, blow my hair back skeptics.
Click to expand...

Tell you what. When you start applying skeptical thought to your posts, and sources, perhaps other skeptics will actually listen to you.
 
acbytesla said:
The polls have been open for weeks. ....well sort of. About 1/3 of all votes are expected to have been cast in some form of early voting. My state is probably more than 50 percent since we vote entirely by mail. I miss going to the polls and voting in person, but this is easier. Never need to wait in a line.
Click to expand...
It is almost as if there is no bombshell. But the big dog promised us one. And no way would he just make **** up. Right?
 
The Big Dog said:
see that highlighted sentence. What skeptic is going to be the first to figure out the massive flaw in his reasoning.

C'mon, blow my hair back skeptics.
Click to expand...

You're taking his "no one has seen" literally? That's a flaw in your reasoning.
 
logger said:
Have you figured out if the house is up for reelection yet? You could ask one of your educated buddies. ;)
Click to expand...

That's it!

I'd say I expected better, but I didn't.

Just a suggestion: sit down and write a letter of appreciation to President Obama for your prosperity and freedoms. He deserves it.

Edit: He's on CNN right now talking about your prosperity. You should watch.
 
Last edited:
thaiboxerken said:
You're taking his "no one has seen" literally? That's a flaw in your reasoning.
Click to expand...

Quarter point for Thai! The no one has seen is key, but Cmon, what is really wrong with his claim that the emails could be changed without anyone being the wiser?

Cmon guys!
 
The Big Dog said:
Quarter point for Thai! The no one has seen is key, but Cmon, what is really wrong with his claim that the emails could be changed without anyone being the wiser?

Cmon guys!
Click to expand...

Some of the wiki leaked emails have been discovered to have been changed. Did you decide to forget that fact?
 
thaiboxerken said:
Bombs cause damage. Hillary's campaign has felt none from wikileaks.
Click to expand...
That's only because the mainstream media is in Hillary's pocket and so they refuse to talk about Hillary's gang's underage prostitution ring or about how they worship Satan.
 
thaiboxerken said:
Some of the wiki leaked emails have been discovered to have been changed. Did you decide to forget that fact?
Click to expand...

Bzzzzzz!

Just focus on what is wrong with the sentence. Another hint: email.

We'll focus on your latest claim shortly.

Email.

Blow me away!
 
The Big Dog said:
Quarter point for Thai! The no one has seen is key, but Cmon, what is really wrong with his claim that the emails could be changed without anyone being the wiser?

Cmon guys!
Click to expand...

Dude, are you serious right now? Is semantics what we're down to, and you're trying to bust me on being skeptical? Sometimes I trust to common sense, for that I'm sorry.

So we have the authors that have seen them, correct? Besides those two, who else do you think has seen them? If wikileaks released something that they stated was "authentic", and then the DNC released an original copy that THEY claimed was "authentic", who would you believe? Answer the question honestly, because if you would believe wikileaks over the authors of the emails, my statement will still stand. That's called reasoning.
 
cantonear1968 said:
That's it!

I'd say I expected better, but I didn't.

Just a suggestion: sit down and write a letter of appreciation to President Obama for your prosperity and freedoms. He deserves it.

Edit: He's on CNN right now talking about your prosperity. You should watch.
Click to expand...

Lol
I certainly expected you would understand the elections for Congress. ;)

I've been prosperous long before Obama. He did help me lose my healthcare plan though, thanks Obama you *******!
 
plague311 said:
Dude, are you serious right now? Is semantics what we're down to, and you're trying to bust me on being skeptical? Sometimes I trust to common sense, for that I'm sorry.

So we have the authors that have seen them, correct? Besides those two, who else do you think has seen them? If wikileaks released something that they stated was "authentic", and then the DNC released an original copy that THEY claimed was "authentic", who would you believe? Answer the question honestly, because if you would believe wikileaks over the authors of the emails, my statement will still stand. That's called reasoning.
Click to expand...

Awww, so close. The sender and the recipients would have them, and that means (ya following?) that.... Drumroll.... Wikileaks would not risk changing them because an author or any of the people who got them could contradict them.... Which.....

HAS. NOT. HAPPENED! As such? Authentic! Fantastic.

Yay, you guys learned something
 
logger said:
Lol
I certainly expected you would understand the elections for Congress. ;)

I've been prosperous long before Obama. He did help me lose my healthcare plan though, thanks Obama you *******!
Click to expand...

Why?

I'm not American.

Well you could thank him for allowing others to become prosperous and hire you. Making you more prosperous.

And maybe you wouldn't lose your health care if you just paid your bills. Since you're so prosperous and all.
 
The Big Dog said:
Awww, so close. The sender and the recipients would have them, and that means (ya following?) that.... Drumroll.... Wikileaks would not risk changing them because an author or any of the people who got them could contradict them.... Which.....

HAS. NOT. HAPPENED! As such? Authentic! Fantastic.

Yay, you guys learned something
Click to expand...


Simply amazing.
 
The Big Dog said:
Awww, so close. The sender and the recipients would have them, and that means (ya following?) that.... Drumroll.... Wikileaks would not risk changing them because an author or any of the people who got them could contradict them.... Which.....

HAS. NOT. HAPPENED! As such? Authentic! Fantastic.

Yay, you guys learned something
Click to expand...

That is the longest way of saying, "plague311, you were right."

See how you didn't answer the question of "Would you trust the senders\recipients word over the word of Wikileaks?" We both know why you ignored it, and that should speak volumes to those that are reading this exchange.
 
plague311 said:
That is the longest way of saying, "plague311, you were right."

See how you didn't answer the question of "Would you trust the senders\recipients word over the word of Wikileaks?" We both know why you ignored it, and that should speak volumes to those that are reading this exchange.
Click to expand...

Bwhahahaha! No you were not right, you see this whole exercise has been to show that you were wrong, and claiming you were right is laughable.

Now, your hilarious goal post move about who we should believe. You made another mistake, a real basic one.

Let's see if you can figure it out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom