Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Huh, Hillary's press secretary told Hillary's campaign manager to go sober her up.

So..... Not really the same thing.

But thanks as always for posting.
You're right, the claim that Trump does crystal meth is far more believable.

Look, we all know that you're just pushing nonsense, but as someone who is familiar with chronic alcoholism (remember, I told you sobering news, which proves you are a chronic alcoholic by your standards of proof), how do people typically sober up a drunk person? What method works best on you? Because I was always told nothing but time could do that.
 
Huh, Hillary's press secretary told Hillary's campaign manager to go sober her up.

So..... Not really the same thing.

But thanks as always for posting.

That's NOT what was said. But I don't really expect you to post the the truth.
 
Remember when the big dog was telling us that it would be shocking if Hillary even ran and that Obama would have to pardon her to keep her out of prison? LOL

I can't wait to drink his tears.
 
Last edited:
Well, we've already had several "Pimp-daddy Presidents," so I guess a "Madame President" should be expected. I for one, would be greatly pleased if that is the only problem we faced with in a regressive HRC Administration. Not that Donnie would be any improvement at all, but his shame falls on Conservatives to accept the blame for.

The second part of this post makes no sense at all. The first sentence does, in a childish, sniggering, inaccurate way.

Overall, a wasted post.
 
Well, we've already had several "Pimp-daddy Presidents," so I guess a "Madame President" should be expected.

OK. Finally got it. But that's "madam."

ETA: Both usages are "madam" apparently. "Madame" is just the way I've seen it due to pretending to read "Madame Bovary."

ETA2: The Internet seems to be tied on this.
 
Last edited:
What are you talking about?

Pimps and madams, in that line.

So that's what is most important to you? Apportioning blame?

Not at all, I just don't like the idea that Progressivism will get blamed for all the regressive policies of another corporatist conservative Democratic politician who claims to be Progressive.

[I thought you were concerned about manmade changes in climate. It seems to me that a president who accepts that it's happening would be better than one who denies it.

Wrong again, There are a lot of people who acknowledge and pay lip service to the problems of climate change, unfortunately, none of the remaining candidates for president have demonstrated that they full heartedly intend to fight for substantive actions to minimize and substantively reverse the problems and causes of AGW. If they aren't doing everything in their power to address this issue they are no better than those who deny the problem.
 
What are the rules on honesty?

Sadly, you can lie through your teeth on the forum and certain members do. But calling members liars will get you warnings and eventually banned even if your label is accurate. The rule is to attack the argument not the arguer.

Unfortunately this oversight about the truth leads to the gish gallop. Where some people will unashamedly lie constantly and they just don't care. You know, like Trump.
 
There are a lot of people who acknowledge and pay lip service to the problems of climate change, unfortunately, none of the remaining candidates for president have demonstrated that they full heartedly intend to fight for substantive actions to minimize and substantively reverse the problems and causes of AGW. If they aren't doing everything in their power to address this issue they are no better than those who deny the problem.
Binary thinking in the extreme.
 
Huh, Hillary's press secretary told Hillary's campaign manager to go sober her up.

So..... Not really the same thing.

But thanks as always for posting.

That's NOT what was said. But I don't really expect you to post the the truth.

"I think you should call her and sober her up some."

Now you will regale the thread of how what I wrote was not what was said.

We'll wait.
 
Another wonderful Anderson Copper take down of Kelly Anne Conway on CNN right now. She's good. He's better.
 
Binary thinking in the extreme.

As we are currently almost to the point where no matter what we do we won't be able to afford the money or resources necessary to adapt, yet alone much impact the damages and destruction that we have already committed to via our fossil carbon emissions. If you don't realize how important this is, you simply aren't paying attention or are trapped in denial.
 
Another content free personal attack. Talk about the sorriest contributions this forum has ever seen.

Oh well,
I don't think it rates as a personal attack. I could be wrong though. By all means, report the post.

Regardless, one might argue that when a poster relentlessly and aggressively lies, obfuscates, and weasels, that poster is inserting him/her self as the topic to an extent.

'k?
 
I don't think it rates as a personal attack. I could be wrong though. By all means, report the post.

Regardless, one might argue that when a poster relentlessly and aggressively lies, obfuscates, and weasels, that poster is inserting him/her self as the topic to an extent.

'k?

You left out "relentlessly spouts unsupported assertions in lieu of arguments", huh?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom