Merged Project Veritas strikes again / More evidence...

[Aepervius]

Real actual facts. I know you Republicans don't care about them.

Facts (and science) are IMO the natural enemy of conservationist. Conservationist want to keep the qui pro quo usually, but as we march from middle age to industrial era, to modern era, new facts and better understanding of the world kept hitting head on conservationist previously "known" truth. And as such it msotly end with the conservationist rejecting the facts in favor of their own belief.

That result in for example rejection of climate change, rejection of evolution in the US as an example in one country.

Note that I did not say "republican" it just happen that republican haws more conservationist than others in the US.

 

[Slowvehicle]

Based on what? What is your evidence that she deserved to be convicted but wasn't? So far all you have is your own contention that this is the case.

"If you don't already agree with me, I won't make an effort to convince you" sounds more like echo chamber rhetoric than skeptical thinking.

Illuminating, innit?

 

[BobTheCoward]

It looks like the Project Veritas videos have sparked at least one review/investigation, by the Repubican Attorney General of Wisconsin.


http://heavy.com/news/2016/10/voter...-department-of-justice-project-veritas-video/


Good. Those videos allege some pretty serious crimes have occurred. Someone should be looking into this. I just hope they can get to the rest of the videos to give some context to the statements.

I disagree. Remember when this group pulled the same crap with planned parenthood? They faced multiple investigations without one revealing a crime. I don't like the idea of the government targeting Americans based on a proven liar source.

 

[Trebuchet]

Facts (and science) are IMO the natural enemy of conservationist. Conservationist want to keep the qui pro quo usually, but as we march from middle age to industrial era, to modern era, new facts and better understanding of the world kept hitting head on conservationist previously "known" truth. And as such it msotly end with the conservationist rejecting the facts in favor of their own belief.

That result in for example rejection of climate change, rejection of evolution in the US as an example in one country.

Note that I did not say "republican" it just happen that republican haws more conservationist than others in the US.

My bold. I believe you've been sabotaged by Autocorrect.

 

[Tsukasa Buddha]

Cesar Vargas has a response article.

 

[Slings and Arrows]

Fine.

If you actually want me to make such a correction, then I will be glad to provide the correction that you want ...

'Slings and Arrows' once lionized a publication called "Komsomolskaya Pravda" which is the equivalent of the "National Enquirer" here in the USA simply because "Komsomolskaya Pravda" contained an anti-Clinton that he wished to give credence to.

As for me, I would say that it quite foolish for one to give credence to either publication considering what these publications are regardless of what the publications may have to say about any issue. However, there are some posters who will cite and lionize any publication simply because that publication happens to publish something that they want to believe in.

I do hope that this message is quite helpful.

That's not a correction. It doesn't even mention the fact that you tried to smear a member of this forum by fabricating a story about "lionizing Pravda".

Nor is there even the hint of an apology to me, or the members of this forum for your reprehensible behavior.

 

[Crossbow]

That's not a correction. It doesn't even mention the fact that you tried to smear a member of this forum by fabricating a story about "lionizing Pravda".

Nor is there even the hint of an apology to me, or the members of this forum for your reprehensible behavior.

Well then ...

How very horrible for you.

 

[catsmate]

Cesar Vargas has a response article.

Unfortunately mere facts aren't going to help against the deeply ingrained nonsense preached by the Clinton haters.

 

[logger]

Facts (and science) are IMO the natural enemy of conservationist. Conservationist want to keep the qui pro quo usually, but as we march from middle age to industrial era, to modern era, new facts and better understanding of the world kept hitting head on conservationist previously "known" truth. And as such it msotly end with the conservationist rejecting the facts in favor of their own belief.

That result in for example rejection of climate change, rejection of evolution in the US as an example in one country.

Note that I did not say "republican" it just happen that republican haws more conservationist than others in the US.

Just to set the record straight, liberals are the ones who want to bring us back to the dark ages, finding a new technology to handle our energy needs is going to require fossil fuels for a bit longer. The left is the "sky is falling crowd"

 

[logger]

Illuminating, innit?

You Really and truly think she got off fairly?

 

[logger]

Well then ...

How very horrible for you.

Lol

Then you double down!

 

[Molinaro]

Just blatant dishonesty, proof that hillary started this violence with her goon squad and you don't even have the honesty to admit it, not surprising.

The group behind it, according to the video is called Mobilize. The violence took place in Feb and Mar. Mobilize did not sign a contract with the DNC until June 8th.

Therefore they were acting on their own and not as a paid by the DNC goon squad.

Once their actions became known to the DNC, and the public, those ties were severed.

 

[Spindrift]

The group behind it, according to the video is called Mobilize. The violence took place in Feb and Mar. Mobilize did not sign a contract with the DNC until June 8th.

Therefore they were acting on their own and not as a paid by the DNC goon squad.

Once their actions became known to the DNC, and the public, those ties were severed.

How dishonest of you to cite facts.

 

[Molinaro]

Oh and the cite would be the article on Time.com and it was discussed by someone from Hillary's campaign on CNN this morning.

 

[varwoche]

Bump for logger...

I have a proposal logger. Instead of trading empty barbs, how about we meticulously pick through the third debate, and tally up the lies. If you're game, I'll start a thread -- just give the word.

 

[Foolmewunz]

Bump for logger...

ConnieAnne Kellway, logger's spokesperson, called. He's not available but she wanted to clear this up.

"Hillary, Hillary, Hillary, Bill, Bill, Liberals, Bill, Bill, Hillary. LOL. Libruls gonna lose."

 

[Childlike Empress]

O'Keefe:

The reason @HillaryClinton didn’t deny her direct involvement with the @realDonaldTrump protests is bc, well, you’ll see tomorrow at noon...

 

[Foolmewunz]

O'Keefe:

It's noon in the USA.

 

[Childlike Empress]

It's noon in the USA.

It's today in the USA.

 

[Foolmewunz]

It's today in the USA.

Slackers.

Nitpick: It's "tomorrow" in the USA.... albeit 1:00 am and not noon.


I got all a-twitter hoping for some more edit-tainment. Darn. Have to wait 11 hours. Will it be as exciting as Assange's presser?