Ready for a ride?

[tinribmancer]

I'd rather not assume that your looking it up on rational wiki automatically indicates that you just learned of it today.


This below could suggest you didnt know it was serious before looking it up.

Because everyone knows who you are, Bubba. And since you're a CTer, this could've been woo.

 

[Bubba]

Because everyone knows who you are, Bubba. And since you're a CTer, this could've been woo.

My point being whether or not you knew of it before today. Thanks.

 

[Dave Rogers]

Did you know that it was Ike who warned of dangers in a Military Industrial Complex, in his farewell?

That makes him a whistleblower rather than a NWO candidate

One might consider, after looking up Military Industrial Complex, looking up Fallacy of Equivocation on Wikipedia.

Dave

 

[Bubba]

One might consider, after looking up Military Industrial Complex, looking up Fallacy of Equivocation on Wikipedia.

Dave

OK that doesnt tell me exactly you how are applying it

Care to elaborate?

 

[JayUtah]

My point being whether or not you knew of it before today. Thanks.

Yeah, that's right. One of the most well-known phrases attached to the Eisenhower presidency, and you're falling all over yourself trying to make it sound like you're schooling everyone here about it. Three posts trying to cram the notion into your critics' mouths that they've never heard the concept before you told them. Instead of your point always being to try to belittle or entrap people here, try making it, you know, a point.

 

[LSSBB]

OK that doesnt tell me exactly you how are applying it

Care to elaborate?

Step 1: Define military-industrial complex

 

[Bubba]

Yeah, that's right. One of the most well-known phrases attached to the Eisenhower presidency, and you're falling all over yourself trying to make it sound like you're schooling everyone here about it. Three posts trying to cram the notion into your critics' mouths that they've never heard the concept before you told them. Instead of your point always being to try to belittle or entrap people here, try making it, you know, a point.

Not at all, the opposite is the case. You knew, perhaps

Yes it is one of the most well-known phrases attached to the Eisenhower presidency. Therefore why would I even attempt that?

I was surprised to see indication that a member was not familiar with one of the most well-known phrases attached to the Eisenhower presidency.

It appears it was true that the member had not heard of it before.

I asked because its not the first time I've noticed such in the member's case.
A matter of age could explain it. Or relatively less familiarity with the material.

Who would not agree that it is surprising to see unfamiliarity with Ike's MIC since its one of the most well-known phrases attached to the Eisenhower presidency

 

[Childlike Empress]

Yeah, that's right. One of the most well-known phrases attached to the Eisenhower presidency, and you're falling all over yourself trying to make it sound like you're schooling everyone here about it. Three posts trying to cram the notion into your critics' mouths that they've never heard the concept before you told them. Instead of your point always being to try to belittle or entrap people here, try making it, you know, a point.

"Everyone"? "Your critics'"? "they"? He was inquiring if a single member who is known for starting threads mocking clueless conspiracy theorists really has never heard about Ike's "creation", and this is a legitimate inquiry given the context.

I don't know why you feel addressed and inspired to "speak up" here, but I could imagine some reasons.

 

[Bubba]

Three posts trying to cram the notion into your critics' mouths

Actually the 3 posts were quote/reply to a specific member for reason explained.

Your failed attack actually made my point as in it is surprising someone here does not know of

One of the most well-known phrases attached to the Eisenhower presidency.

Thank you

 

[JayUtah]

Your failed attack...

Oh, please.

 

[Bubba]

I wonderwill any of the above promote reconsideration of

by JayUtah View Post
Yeah, that's right. One of the most well-known phrases attached to the Eisenhower presidency, and you're falling all over yourself trying to make it sound like you're schooling everyone here about it. Three posts trying to cram the notion into your critics' mouths that they've never heard the concept before you told them. Instead of your point always being to try to belittle or entrap people here, try making it, you know, a point.

 

[Bubba]

Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
Your failed attack...

Oh, please.

OK change it to 'your attack'.

Better?

 

[JayUtah]

I don't know why you feel addressed...

It's a public forum. No one is "addressed." All members are free to post.

...but I could imagine some reasons.

And that's important why?

 

[bruto]

I want to go on record as thanking the intrepid posters here who actually opened the link and listened to that gumbo, so that I don't have to.

 

[Bubba]

by J U

It's a public forum. No one is "addressed." All members are free to post.

Funny gymnastics.

Most entertaining.

I'll try again like how you address certain members repeatedly to answer your questions asked while addressing them earlier:

by Bubba

I wonder will any of the above promote reconsideration of

Quote:
by JayUtah View Post
Yeah, that's right. One of the most well-known phrases attached to the Eisenhower presidency, and you're falling all over yourself trying to make it sound like you're schooling everyone here about it. Three posts trying to cram the notion into your critics' mouths that they've never heard the concept before you told them. Instead of your point always being to try to belittle or entrap people here, try making it, you know, a point.

Pretty please to answer?

 

[Bubba]

by JayUtah View Post
Yeah, that's right. One of the most well-known phrases attached to the Eisenhower presidency, and you're falling all over yourself trying to make it sound like you're schooling everyone here about it. Three posts trying to cram the notion into your critics' mouths that they've never heard the concept before you told them. Instead of your point always being to try to belittle or entrap people here, try making it, you know, a point.

"Everyone"? "Your critics'"? "they"? He was inquiring if a single member who is known for starting threads mocking clueless conspiracy theorists really has never heard about Ike's "creation", and this is a legitimate inquiry given the context.

I don't know why you feel addressed and inspired to "speak up" here, but I could imagine some reasons.

 

[Childlike Empress]

I want to go on record as thanking the intrepid posters here who actually opened the link and listened to that gumbo, so that I don't have to.

Why should you "have to"? To "debunk" it? None of the people who watched them even tried to, it's just far beyond that realm. I shared Mrs. Eisenhower's appearances not to mock her or to prove her wrong, but just for the love of the extraordinary, and agree with statements made by marplots and Fener Fan that they are jaw-dropping fascinating. Take it or leave it.

 

[Bubba]

It's a public forum. No one is "addressed."

example of one member being addressed:

by JayUtah View Post
Yeah, that's right. One of the most well-known phrases attached to the Eisenhower presidency, and you're falling all over yourself trying to make it sound like you're schooling everyone here about it. Three posts trying to cram the notion into your critics' mouths that they've never heard the concept before you told them. Instead of your point always being to try to belittle or entrap people here, try making it, you know, a point.

Is that a tongue in cheeky thingy?

Because of "One of the most well-known phrases attached to the Eisenhower presidency"

All members are free to post.

Is that supposed to have something to do with supporting "No one is "addressed."

 

[trustbutverify]

If any talk needed slides and diagrams, her's did.

Maybe slides and diagrams explaining narcissistic personality disorder and its prevalence in the imbecile mind.

 

[Bubba]

Yeah, that's right. One of the most well-known phrases attached to the Eisenhower presidency, and you're falling all over yourself trying to make it sound like you're schooling everyone here about it.

Thats just plain counter intuitive. I was surprised to see a member not familiar with Ike's M.I.C. so I asked that member only about it (not "everyone").

Three posts trying to cram the notion into your critics' mouths that they've never heard the concept before you told them. Instead of your point always being to try to belittle or entrap people here, try making it, you know, a point.

No. Only the one member. It is a contradiction in terms to say everyone because it is general knowledge, except apparently in the case of the one member because One of the most well-known phrases attached to the Eisenhower presidency

It's a public forum. No one is "addressed." All members are free to post.

Not so. Members address each other all the time. Compliments and insults are not directed to all in the room.


But if you actually mean literally what you wrote I will keep it in mind as good advice for future posting.