Once again, Trump and Clinton are playing two different games. In the game that Clinton, and past presidential candidates, play, plagiarism is a big deal and one loses points. In the game Trump is playing plagiarism is nothing (at least when Team Trump is caught doing it).
Running for president in the 21st century no longer requires consistency, attention to detail, attention to logic, or shame. Folks on this board think it is a big deal. Folks who like Trump think it is evidence of media bias.
Trump's not a republican. He's just a douchebag. The Democratic ticket was filled, so he picked republican.
So is there a generally accepted standard for what counts as plagiarism?
They are outright denying that there was any plagiarism.
Like, a certain number of words in a row that coincide? Something like that?
It seems highly unlikely to me that the two speeches would coincide like that by accident.
http://www.vox.com/2016/7/19/12222276/melania-trump-plagarism-clinton-rnc
Wow, Sean Spicer is a brony.
Once again, Trump and Clinton are playing two different games. In the game that Clinton, and past presidential candidates, play, plagiarism is a big deal and one loses points. In the game Trump is playing plagiarism is nothing (at least when Team Trump is caught doing it).
Running for president in the 21st century no longer requires consistency, attention to detail, attention to logic, or shame. Folks on this board think it is a big deal. Folks who like Trump think it is evidence of media bias.
Politicians plagiarize stuff all the time, it's no big deal.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-accused-of-plagiarism-in-speech/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/19/short-history-political-plagiarism-melania-trump
The man credited with writing Sen. Barack Obama's "power of words" speech today called the plagiarism accusation "not fair" and said it was an attempt to "belittle his ability to motivate people."
...
"It's an elaborate charge and an extravagant one," Patrick said.
Politicians plagiarize stuff all the time, it's no big deal.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-accused-of-plagiarism-in-speech/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/19/short-history-political-plagiarism-melania-trump
Dan Leistikow, Obama's Wisconsin campaign spokesperson, said in an e-mail Patrick and Obama often share strategies.
That link doesn't show what he said. Maybe I am bad at twitter.
Obama has conceded that he should have credited Patrick. "I was on the stump. He [Deval] suggested we use these lines. I thought they were good lines. I'm sure I should have. Didn't this time.
In 1988 Sen. Joseph Biden was driven out of the Democratic nomination race after he used parts of a speech from British Labor party leader Neil Kinnock, without crediting him.
Wasn't just obama, From your link...
After Biden withdrew from the race, it was learned that he had indeed correctly credited Kinnock on other occasions. But in the Iowa speech that was recorded and distributed to reporters (with a parallel video of Kinnock) by aides to Michael Dukakis, the eventual nominee, he failed to do so.
Politicians plagiarize stuff all the time, it's no big deal.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-accused-of-plagiarism-in-speech/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/19/short-history-political-plagiarism-melania-trump
Manafort is whining about the Dems playing politics with a political speech at a political convention. The mind boggles.
As much as I can't stand Trump, Melania's plagiarism is at best a funny story. Her speech was never going to be a reason to vote for or against the Donald.
If you make it more than that, you're too lost in the forest to see the trees.