• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Why not admit that Hubble is lost and gone ?

Malbec said:
You are told you are getting pictures . You don't know the source -- might be HSC . Might not . Could be SOFIA .
And how come HSC is not under the sea , its orbit having decayed since 2008 .
Possibly by a mile an orbit which is every 95 minutes ?
You chaps are not half as smart as you imagine .
Click to expand...

Yet the 'not half as smart as we imagine' are still smarter than a yourself.

Did you ever consider that the orbital information you have is wrong? If not why not? Tell us how you vetted that information and know it is true? Oh wait you just believed what you were told to believe? lol

Next figure out how many people would have to be in on the Hubble being missing and hiding it?

Then take your giant brain and figure out and think about - why would the evil NASA hide this when they have openly announce many many other losses of satellites, probes and other disasters - while faking this one - to what purpose?

You need to think more and spend less time pretending to think.

lol
 
Malbec said:
You are told you are getting pictures . You don't know the source -- might be HSC . Might not . Could be SOFIA .
Click to expand...
How do you know you are not?
Malbec said:
And how come HSC is not under the sea , its orbit having decayed since 2008 .
Possibly by a mile an orbit which is every 95 minutes ?
You chaps are not half as smart as you imagine .
Click to expand...
All of that is bluntly because you are unable to add.

I cannot make you add, nor can anyone else here. This is your cognitive problem.
 
This of course assumes that all the astronomers and researchers using the Hubble data are either in on it or completely incompetent.
 
Since we established hubble is still there we need to focus on the real story.

Russell's Teapot is missing!
 
Malbec said:
You are told you are getting pictures . You don't know the source -- might be HSC . Might not . Could be SOFIA .
And how come HSC is not under the sea , its orbit having decayed since 2008 .
Possibly by a mile an orbit which is every 95 minutes ?
You chaps are not half as smart as you imagine .
Click to expand...

Why you fail:

1. NASA has no reason to lie about anything, especially the Hubble Telescope.
2. NASA has always been honest about equipment failures, even against its better judgement.
3. Hubble burning up in reentry - when it finally does in three or four years - will be visible from the ground.
4. Hubble is public property. NASA must account for it each year.
5. NASA lying about Hubble would give many in Congress reason to kill NASA, and there are many flat-earth Republicans who would like to do that.
6. Hubble will fall into the earth, not bounce out into space. Not going fast enough.

Try embracing Conspiracy Theories that can't be debunked by a telescope.:thumbsup:
 
Axxman300 said:
Why you fail:

5. NASA lying about Hubble would give many in Congress reason to kill NASA, and there are many flat-earth Republicans who would like to do that.
Click to expand...

Is that a metaphor for 'slow-thinking' or are there some real FE YEC senators or representatives?
 
Malbec said:
You are told you are getting pictures . You don't know the source -- might be HSC . Might not . Could be SOFIA .
And how come HSC is not under the sea , its orbit having decayed since 2008 .
Possibly by a mile an orbit which is every 95 minutes ?
You chaps are not half as smart as you imagine .
Click to expand...

Well, someone isn't anyway.
 
Hans said:
Is that a metaphor for 'slow-thinking' or are there some real FE YEC senators or representatives?
Click to expand...

From their actions, I must say yes - though possibly they are not but can only stay elected by espousing the abysmal ignorance of their voters.
 
abaddon said:
Not looked lately, but the nonsense wander aimlessly on, I'm told.

Dammit, you are going to make me look, aren't you?
Click to expand...

Yes and we want a full detailed report - no slacking - or you'll get demerits!
 
Axxman300 said:
Why you fail:

1. NASA has no reason to lie about anything, especially the Hubble Telescope.
2. NASA has always been honest about equipment failures, even against its better judgement.
3. Hubble burning up in reentry - when it finally does in three or four years - will be visible from the ground.
4. Hubble is public property. NASA must account for it each year.
5. NASA lying about Hubble would give many in Congress reason to kill NASA, and there are many flat-earth Republicans who would like to do that.
6. Hubble will fall into the earth, not bounce out into space. Not going fast enough.

Try embracing Conspiracy Theories that can't be debunked by a telescope.:thumbsup:
Click to expand...


This is the single common thing that undermines the vast majority of Conspiracy Theories.

The CT nut bars can all wax lyrical about how "this" doesn't fit, and "that" doesn't fit, and there's this (imagined) anomaly, and that (imagined) anomaly, but ultimately.... ultimately, the CT nuts are never able to provide a motive for the conspirators to perpetrate their conspiracy.

What would NASA have to gain by lying about the demise of HST, when they have already said that it is going to fail anyway?

Why would they not have kept mirror flaws when it was first launched a secret and then and supplied photos from SOFIA (and before that, its predecessor the KAO)?

The CT nut can never give a satisfactory answer to this question! The fact is that NASA has everything to lose and nothing to gain by lying, so why would they?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom