Suddenly, A Flat Earther Appears!

Care to tell us Daniel how the Salar de Uyuni came to be where it is in your newly adopted FEBS scenario ?

and why I can't take this photo from my location in the northern hemisphere.

2mqu8eg.jpg


http://www.southbrooklyn.com/beyond-brooklyn/spectacular-sea-salt-bolivias-salar-de-uyuni

Experimental proof required, obviously.
 
Daniel said:
That's so 'Objective' of you :rolleyes: How do you know that Professor before you even look? Ever heard of Pre-Conceived Bias??

oy vey
Click to expand...

Well, there's that weird business where I can watch live sport from Aus or NZ and it's in broad daylight there but totally dark where I live in the N hemisphere. And vice-versa when they play late in the evening 'down there'.

Conspiracy? Are those sport broadcasts all on a time-delay? I'm amazed the bookies haven't been bankrupted by people phoning through the results before they're broadcast on TV on the other side of the world.
 
Last edited:
threadworm said:
Care to tell us Daniel how the Salar de Uyuni came to be where it is in your newly adopted FEBS scenario ?
Click to expand...


1. Don't remember.

2. Why?? You need some ammo for your Genetic Fallacy Gun?


and why I can't take this photo from my location in the northern hemisphere.

[qimg]http://i63.tinypic.com/2mqu8eg.jpg[/qimg]

http://www.southbrooklyn.com/beyond-brooklyn/spectacular-sea-salt-bolivias-salar-de-uyuni
Click to expand...


Where are you in the Northern Hemisplane...?


Experimental proof required, obviously.
Click to expand...


1. Experimental Proof of what? Taking Pictures isn't an Experiment (LOL). What's the Independent Variable... the Lens Cap?? :boggled:

2. When are you gonna provide some, obviously?


regards
 
GlennB said:
Well, there's that weird business where I can watch live sport from Aus or NZ and it's in broad daylight there but totally dark where I live in the N hemisphere.
Click to expand...


Well File 13 your fairytale 'belief' that the Sun is 93 million miles away with a Radius of 400,000 mile + THEN...recompute.

Extrapolations from fairytales... leads to fairytales, 'downstream'.


regards
 
Daniel said:
Well File 13 your fairytale 'belief' that the Sun is 93 million miles away with a Radius of 400,000 mile + THEN...recompute.

Extrapolations from fairytales... leads to fairytales, 'downstream'.


regards
Click to expand...

Please explain how different countries experience day and night offset by several hours. Sometimes 12.
 
Tale said:
Since it's the flat earth wiki, it likely means something very wrong. I'm not giving it the click.
Click to expand...


:covereyes, eh? It's merely a screenshot of results from "AutoCAD 2015". You can download the software and do it yourself.


regards
 
Daniel said:
:covereyes, eh? It's merely a screenshot of results from "AutoCAD 2015". You can download the software and do it yourself.


regards
Click to expand...

It's construction software for buildings. I'm not sure why you're looking to it for global curvature.
 
Last edited:
Daniel said:
1. Don't remember.
Click to expand...

Then I suggest you look into it and explain how it is possible in your FEBS

2. Why?? You need some ammo for your Genetic Fallacy Gun?
Click to expand...

Meaningless gibberish.


Where are you in the Northern Hemisphere...?
Click to expand...

Far enough north to have never seen the southern cross, ever.

1. Experimental Proof of what? Taking Pictures isn't an Experiment (LOL). What's the Independent Variable... the Lens Cap?? :boggled:

2. When are you gonna provide some, obviously?
Click to expand...

Oh come now that's not how it works Daniel you know that - as you so ably demonstrated all I need to do is ask you a question, demand experimental proof to support your answer and there we go, job done.

Sauce for the goose.
 
Daniel said:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiOhsKAR6OY

Seasons and Moon Phases:
Click to expand...

Er, that only explains local light by assuming it beams down like a flashlight. Even then, the sun would be visible in all parts even though diminished, like N Finland during the night during its summer.

But it seems you feel free to post the most massive pile of cock whenever it suits you. Good luck.
 
jaydeehess said:
Perhaps, as the man once said "location, location, location" would be the variable.
Click to expand...


Great!!!

So "The Cause" (Independent Variable) is different locations and "The Effect" (Dependent Variable, "Prediction") is different pictures ??

Astonishing!! a Physics Nobel is in your future. :thumbsup:


regards
 
threadworm said:
Far enough north to have never seen the southern cross, ever.
Click to expand...


Thought so. Thanks for offering your Scientific accuracy and precision :rolleyes:

Well there's many issues, not limited to: Topography, Atmospheric Refraction, Atmospheric Extinction, Perspective ect.

Both Polaris and the Southern Cross have been observed simultaneously between the 12th and 13th degree South Latitude...

paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi-bin/paperspast?a=d&d=TO18890720.2.8

Care to explain that? :D



Oh come now that's not how it works Daniel you know that - as you so ably demonstrated all I need to do is ask you a question, demand experimental proof to support your answer and there we go, job done.
Click to expand...


So I need to provide Experimental Proof, right (??) but not you, eh? :rolleyes:

I've already DONE that, here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=11364725&postcount=191

I even gave you the VALID Formal Scientific Hypotheses, for goodness sakes!!


regards
 
threadworm said:
Far enough north to have never seen the southern cross, ever.
Click to expand...

Neither have I. I have also been to places where the light goes bye-bye for months on end.

Danny boy can do so too. There are flights to Churchill, Manitoba, Canada. All he need do is book one that lands during the "day" in December. Book passage on the same plane on its return south, no need to even stay over 'night', although staying for 24 hours would be in order. Do the very same thing in June and note that its a lot brighter all day long.

Have a trusted friend do the same to the southern tip of S.America on the same days and note the exact opposite occurring.

Of course a trip further north, say to Resolute Bay, NWT, Canada, would give you complete '24hr dark/24hr sun'.
 
Last edited:
Daniel said:
Thought so. Thanks for offering your Scientific accuracy and precision :rolleyes:

Well there's many issues, not limited to: Topography, Atmospheric Refraction, Atmospheric Extinction, Perspective ect.

Both Polaris and the Southern Cross have been observed simultaneously between the 12th and 13th degree South Latitude...

paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/cgi-bin/paperspast?a=d&d=TO18890720.2.8

Care to explain that? :D
Click to expand...
1862!! 1889!!

Ok, should be easy to confirm. Perhaps since the advent of modern photography someone has managed to capture this phenomena, and you will be posting it real soon.

In fact you could do the 1889 observation one better and find such photo from between the 40th and 41st latitudes.
 
Last edited:
GlennB said:
Er, that only explains local light by assuming it beams down like a flashlight.
Click to expand...


That's not an 'assumption'...

Sun%20Hot%20Spot_zpsq345yfpk.jpg


:D


Even then, the sun would be visible in all parts even though diminished, like N Finland during the night during its summer.
Click to expand...


No, it wouldn't...as previously illustrated.



But it seems you feel free to post the most massive pile of cock whenever it suits you.
Click to expand...


Thanks for the Generalized Sweeping "Hand-Wave Dismissal" Ipse Dixit Baseless 'bare' Assertion (Fallacy).



regards
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom