NoahFence
Banned
I found the missing Jolt.
- Thread starter Crazy Chainsaw
- Start date
Tony Szamboti
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2007
- Messages
- 4,976
Yeah that's my shtick alright. Just can't fool you. You just too smart, or more like too much of a smart ass, like DGM, ProBonoShill, and some other regulars here.
What actually surprises me is why you and these others constantly hang out on a boring forum like this. Once in a while I tend to think it might be your job.
Have fun at work. I probably won't be on for a while as I will be discussing things with tfk on the 911 free forum.
Last edited:
NoahFence
Banned
I like the other sections, and from time to time enjoy seeing you people make fools of yourselves attempting to discuss the most comically stupid ideas in human history.
Alternatively, you could try tying together the entire days events?
Alternatively, you could try tying together the entire days events?
jaydeehess
Penultimate Amazing
ob·vi·ous
ˈ
adjective
- easily perceived or understood; clear, self-evident, or apparent.
"unemployment has been the most obvious cost of the recession"
synonyms: clear, crystal clear, plain, plain to see, evident, apparent, manifest, patent, conspicuous, pronounced, transparent, palpable, prominent, marked, decided, distinct, noticeable, unmissable, perceptible, visible, discernible
- predictable and lacking in subtlety.
"it was an obvious remark to make"
,,, And now this :
We have been hearing that the demolition of three of a dozen or so affected buildings is so very obvious for almost a decade and a half now. Tony Szamboti tires of arguing this online, suspects that some of those arguing against him are in fact presenting specious arguments, that they are paid to be here, and elsewhere, to obfuscate and deny this ohhh, sooo, veeery OBVIOUS, demolition. He's not alone , I personally have run across several truthers who have said much the same about the OBVIOUS nature of the explosive demolitions of WTC1, 2 , & 7.
It is highly incongruous then that the vast majority of professional structural and indeed, demolitions experts have not sought out AE911T and their ilk. Despite 14+ years of propaganda on this very meme, AE911T has utterly failed to convince anything other than a small percentage of engineers in total and even fewer who are structural or even civil or mechanical engineers.
Last edited:
NoahFence
Banned
That's what happens when a group tries to sell the most insane, most impossible, and clearly the most stupid ideas in human history.
To fool people; golly, you have less than 0.1 percent of all engineers to sign up for a new investigation after they failed to comprehend CD is a fantasy.
You have to think this is our job, telling you your real-cd-deal is a fantasy based on paranoia. You have to make up lies to have your fantasy.
Yes, you will be discussing your CD fantasy, and I hope you give details on how the aircraft were used as a ruse for your CD fantasy.
Your CD fantasy has you seeking revenge when you and the 9/11 truth part of lies take over and make us pay...
This can't get more paranoid but it does.
Crazy claims of CD, planting charges, make for crazier stories.
Thus, we have the aircraft, the 19 terrorists, were a ruse to cover up the planting of the silent explosives which leave no evidence. Magic bombs planted by invisible thugs who are willing to murder thousands so we can screw up the middle east more.
Good one Tony, your realcddeal failed out of the box.
How much are we paid to post to your fantasy BS here at a forum, a sub-forum where crazy claims about 9/11 are discussed.
Tony, you realize we can post from the hot tub, the pub, anywhere? And we NWO operatives can use a pad, a tablet, a phone, a laptop, a desktop computer, etc... Do we get paid more for posting on the road? on fathers day? Too bad you have zero practical knowledge of structural engineering, fire science, and physics.
Where do you get the silent explosives Tony?
You are a complete, total amateur.
You have some (barely related) background, that is completely overwhelmed by consistent incompetence & rampant conspiricism.
I am also an amateur. An informed amateur.
I got a better education than you did, I've got 10 more years of experience, I am NOT consistently confused by simple engineering principles (as you are), I've had far more success in my career than you.
And in the matter of collapse of tall buildings, unlike you, I now know what I'm talking about.
NOT because I'm an expert.
But because I recognized that I am NOT an expert, I set aside my ego, & I listened very carefully to what the experts had to say.
We'll both find this out shortly...
Tony Szamboti
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2007
- Messages
- 4,976
Yes, we will find out shortly starting tomorrow. Judging from your emotional outburst here it might be hard for you, but you will have to keep to the subject in the debate and refrain from derogatory comments. They aren't allowed by either of us and they add nothing of substance to the discussion.
Just to let you know, your bombastic posts do make me think you act like something that begins with an "a", but the word amateur is not what comes to mind.
Last edited:
How will we be held to account for pointing out you have a fantasy?
How does the aircraft used as a ruse work?
Last edited:
It's plausible if by "chickens" you mean black ops personnel, and by "delusional state" you mean the promise of boat loads of cash.
So, yea, if you get really creative with the definition of "chickens" and "delusional state", then it certainly is plausible.
This evidence has been posted. You choose to ignore it.
No investigation is complete unless it thoroughly examines every reasonable possibility.
Is it credible?
I know that you believe this.
I'm avoiding your constant avoiding of facts.
Please post some "undeniable" evidence, and see if I deny it.
Last edited:
Interesting.
When was that interview conducted?
When was the WTC7 interview conducted?
What challenge?