I guess you didn't hear him say that he was "speculating". When you say you are speculating about something, you are not lying. You are merely speculating.
The quality of one’s understanding of any topic is VERY WELL exposed by their speculations.
When someone understands some phenomenon, then one can speculate accurately.
When one does not understand some phenomenon, then one’s speculations are wildly out of touch with reality.
Gage’s speculations are wildly out of touch with reality.
He doesn’t have the slightest idea that explosives have expiration dates.
He isn’t aware of the fact that, if explosives were placed on columns during construction (early 1970’s for the towers), or during renovations (all thru their 30 year life), then those same explosives would have been exposed to the hundreds of workers who finished each floors’ construction.
He isn’t aware of the fact that, every time some electrician or construction worker exposed behind the walls, or the wire running areas above the ceiling or below the floor, they would have run into miles of “mystery wire”. Do you have any idea how careful electricians are when identifying the type of wire that they are digging into, when running AC, phone lines, data lines, etc.? Do you have any concept of how many times these miles of det cord & initiator wire would have been found?
What the hell do YOU think would happen if some worker pulls off some wall to do some maintenance or remodeling … and finds explosive charges wired to the structural columns…??!! Do you really think that he ignores it?
The whole thing is 100% looney tunes.
Which exposes exactly how little Gage understands about building construction, maintenance, renovation, etc.
But he IS an architect. Supposedly, he’s worked on building renovation.
So he can NOT claim ignorance about what goes on in
I admit that his speculation about explosives being planted in the 1980's is extremely far-fetched. This does not help his credibility. I wonder why he would have said this, and when he said it.
The ONLY explanation is that this moronic claim shows how much he cares about pushing his giant fabrication & how little he cares about telling the truth.
I admit that known examples of CD are complicated endeavors. That is a fact. There is no reason to deny it.
But, wait for it…
You’re about to do exactly that … deny it.
What the skeptics fail to admit is that they don't know everything. They assume that all CD must be the same. That is speculation. It is not fact; it is speculation.
And there it is.
Your denial of the fact that “the single largest building demolitions ever attempted do not have to be complicated endeavors.”
Now, let me explain a little about “speculation”.
As I said above, the quality of one’s speculation is determined by the quality of one’s understanding of the topic.
Mark Loiseaux’s speculation about giant building demolition is superb. He’s a world class expert in the field.
Your speculation, & Richard Gage’s speculation, & Jonathan Cole’s speculation, and Tony Szamboti’s speculation isn’t worth a fart in a hurricane.
__
Also, regarding “speculation”.
The speculation that it would be a massive complex endeavor, incapable of being hidden from the occupants, is based on the REALITY of every other CD ever performed.
Your speculation that “the CD of three skyscrapers in NYC does not need to be “a really complicated endeavor” or “destined to be found by maintenance workers if left for months/years/decades”, is speculation based upon … not one CD ever performed prior to this date.
It is based on nothing except your clueless fantasy about what would be required.
Skeptics can make all of the arguments they want against CD, but physics shows that the official story is wrong.
You … and physics.
How many times do we have to go thru this?
If the official story is wrong, what brought down WTC1, 2 and 7?
Simple.
NOTHING was capable of bringing down those building, without leaving a trace on video, in decades of recorded information about the maintenance of the building, etc. EXCEPT exactly what was seen.
No space ray beams, no mini-nukes, no HAARP rays, no thermite & no Hush-A-Boom CDs.
Many signs point to CD. The only way we will ever find out is to get a new investigation.
ZERO signs point to CD.
Not one single thing.
A mountain of proof exists that there could not possibly have been a CD.
Clueless wishful thinking on the part of twisted little boys, delusions of moral & intellectual superiority is the ONLY thing that suggests … well, it does NOT suggest CDs. It suggests only the fact that twisted little boys seem to be powerless to suppress their delusions of moral & intellectual superiority.
Your delusions of moral & intellectual superiority are exactly as fake as your delusions of understanding physics.
Don’t you think that it’s about time that you grew up?
