Actually, thermodynamics proves heaven is hotter than hell.
It's been done. You are incorrect and relativity seems to be holding up pretty well despite your protestations.
Yes, you present it as a paper, but it isn't. It is simply a document you posted on s_cie_nce_37(dot)com, a website you own and operate. (intentional borking of URL).
The ignorance of demanding that we do your work for you is bad, Bjarne. It suggests that you cannot do the calculations because of ignorance of physics.
Your friend lied previously by not providing evidence about Galileo 5 & 6. You then spread that lie without checking their story.
Whoops, Bjarne: "1½ minut" to find out that it is a lie that your PDF contains calculations for space probes leaving the solar system or flybys of Earth
! The PDF is about the delusion that ACES on the ISS and Galileo 5 and 6 results will magically give different results from the same experiments performed before. A difference is that ACES has clocks in orbit to be compared to ground based clocks.Wrong, Bjarne. What looks like ignorance of the scientific literature (and even the Internet!) does not justify paranoia about science.
Shooting yourself in the foot, Bjarne: This is a conference report about the Pioneer Anomaly. The author talked to maybe hundreds of scientists about the Pioneer Anomaly at the 12th Australian Space Science Conference, Melbourne. 24--26 Sept 2012. He talked abut whether the anomaly could be "due to „mundane‟ systematic errors/effects or indicative of new or unappreciated physics.". He questions the thermal recoil solution but never addresses any problems with it - just quotes an opinion. He lists many papers. No hiding under the blanket here
!Your claim includes that Galileo 5 & 6 will invalidate GR. That means that you know that Galileo 5 & 6 are two of these "few satellites". So:
I predict that that these tests will add further support for SR/GR (as will the ISS atomic clock experiment due to fly in '17).
Whoops, Bjarne: "1½ minut" to find out that it is a lie that your PDF contains calculations for space probes leaving the solar system or flybys of Earth
Shooting yourself in the foot, Bjarne: This is a conference report about the Pioneer Anomaly. The author talked to maybe hundreds of scientists about the Pioneer Anomaly at the 12th Australian Space Science Conference, Melbourne. 24--26 Sept 2012. He talked abut whether the anomaly could be "due to „mundane‟ systematic errors/effects or indicative of new or unappreciated physics.". He questions the thermal recoil solution but never addresses any problems with it - just quotes an opinion. He lists many papers. No hiding under the blanket here
That 10 years old school boy will conclude that you lied by stating that you had done the calculations in the PDF you linked to, Bjarne.
Shooting yourself in the foot, Bjarne: This is a conference report about the Pioneer Anomaly. The author talked to maybe hundreds of scientists about the Pioneer Anomaly at the 12th Australian Space Science Conference, Melbourne. 24--26 Sept 2012. He talked abut whether the anomaly could be "due to „mundane‟ systematic errors/effects or indicative of new or unappreciated physics.". He questions the thermal recoil solution but never addresses any problems with it - just quotes an opinion. He lists many papers. No hiding under the blanket here
