If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II

[MicahJava]

Did they use One Meridian Plaza after the fire?

Why do you lie about 9/11? 19 terrorists did 9/11, they would be laughing at your inability to figure out what they did, all by themselves.

One Meridian Plaza... lol, the firemen pulled back, they feared collapse... read the report next time...

Half-truth. After ELEVEN HOURS OF RAGING FIRES, an engineer on the scene said that maybe there was danger of collapse. He did not say that it would collapse and he did not try predicting when it would collapse. It did not collapse. The building remained standing as a charred skeleton.

oops fire does damage steel.

[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/onemeridiansag.jpg[/qimg]
Go ahead compare it to the WTC, and we see steel fails in fire... darn, you are self debunking.

If 9/11 was at night, the whole small fire, cold fire, little fires BS would be gone. Why does 9/11 truth cling to fantasy dumbed down for those who can't think for themselves?

The fires in the WTC towers were more heat energy than 2,700 tons of thermite... is thermite your fantasy, another lie is fueling your speculation based on BS?

So, interior structural steel slowly and gradually sagged without sudden catastrophic failure? That's nice.

 

[MicahJava]

Still waiting for an answer, that new investigation isn't gong to happen by itself.

Do better.

When did I say "thermite was used"? I just said that the presence of iron microspheres is a known residue of an exotic accelerant, and should be on the list of reasons why inside job should be investigated.

 

[NoahFence]

And you have no explanation as to how such precise foresight of a historical first is possible. Seriously, a skyscraper is on fire for an hour and some anonymous guy predicts it's collapse five hours after? That doesn't sound weird to you? You will either meet me with a half-answer or try to justify one historical first with .

Of course I have an explanation. You think I'm a truther?
Lol, no.

It's possible because prior to 9-11, there have been (stupid guess) tens of thousands of examples of steel failing in a fire. Every time steel failed in a fire, in human history, fire science has taken notes, getting educated.

You people have stood on the side of the road, the entire time, yelling at passers-by. Trying to convince them that something was amiss with those in power. They were up to something, and it was going down soon. Hundreds of years later, we're still waiting.

While you were doing that, fire science has effectively made it so that even a printer like me predicted it would fall, and I was right. Steel fails in fire.

 

[ProBonoShill]

When did I say "thermite was used"?

Okay so cutter charges weren't used and thermite wasn't used, what substance brought down the towers then? Did this substance bring down all three towers and the other buildings that collapsed that day or just the WTC 1, 2 and 7?

I just said that the presence of iron microspheres is a known residue of an exotic accelerant, and should be on the list of reasons why inside job should be investigated.

Iron microspheres are present in a lot of situations.

What exotic accelerant? Does it have a name?

Was this exotic accelerant the cause of the explosion heard in the Ashley Banfield video you posted?

 

[FalseFlag]

Anyone who doesn't use the word "massive" or a synonym of it to describe them is either suffering from a head injury or didn't get enough oxygen at birth.

That's science!

I didn't expect you to get the hidden meaning. It would have been nice, but, as usual, you don't surprise me.

 

[FalseFlag]

The fires in the WTC towers were more heat energy than 2,700 tons of thermite.

Source? Grimm's Fairy Tales don't count.

 

[FalseFlag]

So let me get this straight, you think explosive sounds were scrubbed from all the videos in the above link?

It does not matter what I think.

 

[FalseFlag]

I'm going to start a thread in the future with the times of all captured explosions laid out. I'll post it then.

If you want to make a little bit more of an ass of yourself and claim they don't exist I'll post them now.

Post a video of people running and saying "gas leak". Oh, it has to be from 9/11/2001, and it has to be legitimate.

 

[FalseFlag]

Yea, time that could be spent trying to find a collapse time of no more than 6 seconds.

Any luck with that yet?

You seem fixated with 6 seconds.

 

[MicahJava]

Of course I have an explanation. You think I'm a truther?
Lol, no.

It's possible because prior to 9-11, there have been (stupid guess) tens of thousands of examples of steel failing in a fire. Every time steel failed in a fire, in human history, fire science has taken notes, getting educated.

You people have stood on the side of the road, the entire time, yelling at passers-by. Trying to convince them that something was amiss with those in power. They were up to something, and it was going down soon. Hundreds of years later, we're still waiting.

While you were doing that, fire science has effectively made it so that even a printer like me predicted it would fall, and I was right. Steel fails in fire.

If it was so obvious and predictable, then why do both the NIST and ARUP report use the rare and unpredictable event of thermal expansion to explain how the collapse initiated? They should've just tried to find the Jesus engineer and he would tell them all the answers.

 

[ProBonoShill]

Half-truth. After ELEVEN HOURS OF RAGING FIRES, an engineer on the scene said that maybe there was danger of collapse. He did not say that it would collapse and he did not try predicting when it would collapse. It did not collapse. The building remained standing as a charred skeleton.



So, interior structural steel slowly and gradually sagged without sudden catastrophic failure? That's nice.

No engineer on the scene here, building collapsed, fireman died.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/10/1...-killed-after-burning-building-collapses.html

Thankfully one some were present during 9/11 and lives were saved.

I'm still waiting for your explanation about the engineer you claim was complicit in mass murder.

So let's get this straight, he and his fellow killers in the FDNY were worried about the building collapsing ordered every one out and all firefighters back, essentially saving their lives. That seems strange doesn't it.

Why would they warn anyone? Why wouldn't they just keep quiet, not let anyone know what they suspected and murder some more people when the building fell down?

Better yet why would they wait 7 hours to blow up the building, when they could've destroyed it right away, with people still in it so they could happily add to the death total?

 

[ProBonoShill]

It does not matter what I think.

Well at least you're right about one thing. Let me know when you produce that video, the lurkers want to see it.

 

[ProBonoShill]

Source? Grimm's Fairy Tales don't count.

Learn math.

 

[ProBonoShill]

You seem fixated with 6 seconds.

You seem unable to answer his queries. How are you going to advocate for a new investigation when you constantly leave all these questions unanswered?

 

[MicahJava]

No engineer on the scene here, building collapsed, fireman died.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/10/1...-killed-after-burning-building-collapses.html

Thankfully one some were present during 9/11 and lives were saved.

"Berardi lauded the bravery of the two firefighters who died and the scene was described as chaotic and apparently deteriorated quickly.

Fire Department Battalion Chief James Garrett told the Kansas City Star that the building was already heavily damaged when firefighters arrived. They were clearing an area where a roof had started to cave in about 7:30 p.m. when the building collapsed, Garrett said."

It would seem that the firefighters cleared the area because the fire was dangerous enough to kill one of them. Are you really just resorting to posting random small buildings that collapsed?

ProBonoShill, WTC 7 was not a short apartment building. Nor was it the Kader Toy Factory or Dogwood Elementary School. It was a tall, strong, fireproofed steel-framed high rise and that engineer (who would have worked there) would know that it was strong as ****.

I'm still waiting for your explanation about the engineer you claim was complicit in mass murder.

So let's get this straight, he and his fellow killers in the FDNY were worried about the building collapsing ordered every one out and all firefighters back, essentially saving their lives. That seems strange doesn't it.

Why would they warn anyone? Why wouldn't they just keep quiet, not let anyone know what they suspected and murder some more people when the building fell down?

Better yet why would they wait 7 hours to blow up the building, when they could've destroyed it right away, with people still in it so they could happily add to the death total?

If the engineer knew about a controlled demolition, his goal in telling the firefighters it was in danger of collapse by structural failure would be so that they clear the area before they figure out a way to extinguish the fires.

As for why wait seven hours to blow it up, there could be any number of reasons that there's no way I could know. You mention that it would be better to demo it right away. This gets into the possibility that WTC 7 was actually meant to be demolished under the dust cloud of the North Tower and have it's collapse remain a quiet mystery, but something went wrong in the demolition so plan B was implemented until the problem was fixed.

 

[ProBonoShill]

"Berardi lauded the bravery of the two firefighters who died and the scene was described as chaotic and apparently deteriorated quickly.

Fire Department Battalion Chief James Garrett told the Kansas City Star that the building was already heavily damaged when firefighters arrived. They were clearing an area where a roof had started to cave in about 7:30 p.m. when the building collapsed, Garrett said."

It would seem that the firefighters cleared the area because the fire was dangerous enough to kill one of them. Are you really just resorting to posting random small buildings that collapsed?

ProBonoShill, WTC 7 was not a short apartment building. Nor was it the Kader Toy Factory or Dogwood Elementary School. It was a tall, strong, fireproofed steel-framed high rise and that engineer (who would have worked there) would know that it was strong as ****.

So firefighters described above cleared the area because the fire was dangerous, but at WTC 7 it wasn't dangerous? Is this the idiocy you're asserting????

If the engineer knew about a controlled demolition, his goal in telling the firefighters it was in danger of collapse by structural failure would be so that they clear the area before they figure out a way to extinguish the fires.

LOL What? Why would he do that? All the people ended up evacuating and escaped death including the firefighters. Massive fail for those blood thirsty murders. You realize you're not making sense at all right?

As for why wait seven hours to blow it up, there could be any number of reasons that there's no way I could know. You mention that it would be better to demo it right away. This gets into the possibility that WTC 7 was actually meant to be demolished under the dust cloud of the North Tower and have it's collapse remain a quiet mystery, but something went wrong in the demolition so plan B was implemented until the problem was fixed

Well list a few, I'd like to hear a plausible explanation on why a group you claim wanted murder thousands of it's fellow citizens waited 7 hours and ended up killing not a single person.

Does that sound rational to you?

Please describe Plan B, I'd love to hear it.

 

[ProBonoShill]

Okay so cutter charges weren't used and thermite wasn't used, what substance brought down the towers then? Did this substance bring down all three towers and the other buildings that collapsed that day or just the WTC 1, 2 and 7?



Iron microspheres are present in a lot of situations.

What exotic accelerant? Does it have a name?

Was this exotic accelerant the cause of the explosion heard in the Ashley Banfield video you posted?

Still waiting....

 

[ProBonoShill]

If it was so obvious and predictable, then why do both the NIST and ARUP report use the rare and unpredictable event of thermal expansion to explain how the collapse initiated? They should've just tried to find the Jesus engineer and he would tell them all the answers.

Steel doesn't do well in fire, especially when it's unfought. This is like 3rd grade level science. I mean if you have evidence steel strengthens during a fire please post it.

 

[waypastvne]

Post a video of people running and saying "gas leak". Oh, it has to be from 9/11/2001, and it has to be legitimate.

I can give you 2 videos.

Can you give us an example of an "object in uniform motion" now that you are all knowledged up on Newtons first law ?

 

[MicahJava]

So firefighters described above cleared the area because the fire was dangerous, but at WTC 7 it wasn't dangerous? Is this the idiocy you're asserting????

There was no basis at 11 AM, 12 PM, or 1 PM to say that WTC 7 would collapse. If operations were abandoned due to the danger of the actual fire, that wouldn't be suspicious, but it wasn't. The collapse zone was made because a person identified as an engineer from the Office of Emergency Management told them that it would collapse in five or six hours, which lead to the fire chiefs making the decision to pull away.

LOL What? Why would he do that? All the people ended up evacuating and escaped death including the firefighters. Massive fail for those blood thirsty murders. You realize you're not making sense at all right?

Having the firefighters avoid WTC 7 like the plague would prevent them from figuring out a way to extinguish the fires, such as recharging the sprinkler system by connecting a water line to the siamese fittings.

Well list a few, I'd like to hear a plausible explanation on why a group you claim wanted murder thousands of it's fellow citizens waited 7 hours and ended up killing not a single person.

Does that sound rational to you?

Because of course you have to find a motive for a crime before you begin investigating it.

Please describe Plan B, I'd love to hear it.

Stage 1: http://i.imgur.com/gXi2bmF.gifv

Stage 2: Some time between 10:30 AM and 12:00 PM, person(s) sneak in to WTC 7 to set fires on separate floors.

Stage 3: "Engineer" tells fire chiefs that WTC 7 is in danger of collapse.

Stage 4: http://i.imgur.com/n5lqQ70.gifv

Of course, I'm not saying there's any way to know this is how it would go down.