Thanks. You skeptics have set a fine example to follow.
Last edited:
If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong. Part II
- Thread starter Seymour Butz
- Start date
Axxman300
Philosopher
You mean the over 3,000+ pages devoted to this topic on this board since 2007-ish? Wherein all the topics you've "just discovered" have been hashed out, debated, and mostly resolved, that example?
There's an active thread on this sub-board right now where specifics are being debated by guys who are knowledgeable about the subject matter. No wise cracks, no insults, just point and counter-point, and it's all conducted with basic respect. You have over 2,021 posts, 2% meet the standards I've listed.
Ape of Good Hope
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2011
- Messages
- 1,502
ProBonoShill
Master Poster
- Joined
- May 17, 2010
- Messages
- 2,329
Well it seems the skeptics are winning the hearts and minds of the lurkers and you're failing badly.
Was is that?
You claimed you were "obsessed with the truth" so why are you here embarrassing yourself by posting a bunch of nonsensical drivel?
How is that getting you closer to your precious new investigation?
Crazy Chainsaw
Philosopher
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 8,339
Because for him nonsensical drivel is the truth, maybe we should leave him to post and answer his posts alone. After all he brings up no valid points of discussion.
I'm sure he has been very busy but he will admit he was wrong any time now.I note that junior posts very infrequently after this schooling.
Hold your breath, it's almost there.
grandmastershek
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2009
- Messages
- 1,461
Amazing how FF just admitted he has a google extension to do his thinking for him.
NoahFence
Banned
Schooling. Yes. It's what happens when one gets educated.
Your claim was that 2.5 seconds represented "half of the total collapse time".
You were shown quite clearly, quite often, that your statement was patently false.
Schooled. Educated.
Even though you lack the courage to admit it. That's why you ignored that post.
HotRodDeluxe
Muse
- Joined
- May 26, 2012
- Messages
- 692
Guys, please stop feeding it.
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
Heed your own advice........................
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=11279279#post11279279
HotRodDeluxe
Muse
- Joined
- May 26, 2012
- Messages
- 692
Heed your own advice........................
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=11279279#post11279279
Ok, point taken, however, it is quite clear that this member is just here to yank chains.
Crazy Chainsaw
Philosopher
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 8,339
Ok, point taken, however, it is quite clear that this member is just here to yank chains.
He needs to be careful of the chain he yanks, or he might find himself anchored forever in his own fraudulent fantasy alone.
Why don't you get off of your lazy, ignorant ass & do a little work for yourself.
In my first post to you, I provided you with a textbook that has hundreds of examples.
I also provided you with a link to the lab notes for a "Scaling of structural models" class.
There were several, worked out examples there.
You've read neither. You've looked at neither.
Your determined ignorance is the result of your own determined laziness.
It might be your mommy's job to cater to lazy, rude, resolutely ignorant punks.
It ain't mine.
HSienzant
Philosopher
Still an attempt to switch the burden of proof, no matter how many times you ask that question and how many times I point out the logical fallacy you're employing.
Apparently you have nothing except logical fallacies to fall back on at this point.
Hank
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/system/App/HomepageRow/images/000/000/002/original/poster.jpg
For those that complain the picture is too small to read, go here -
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/sy...000/001/original/FallaciesPosterHigherRes.jpg
Calling a statement a logical fallacy does not mean it is one. You might want to spend a little time studying this poster. Then, go back and correct your errors. Have fun.
Oh, I almost forgot. Does anyone have an experiment proving Cole is wrong?
Edited by Loss Leader:
Image changed to URL. Do not hotlink unless websites specifically allow it.
Last edited by a moderator:
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
Do you have proof you have a clue?
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
So, you have no proof you are not a clueless religious believer?
DGM
Skeptic not Atheist
You still have never actually backed up any of your assertions. That makes you a believer.