Continuation Part 18: Amanda Knox/Raffaele Sollecito

[LondonJohn]

As the closet was inbuilt into the alcove, there wasn't a wardrobe top.

Is sarcasm your highest form of debating skill? Must do better.

I have to ask: does Vixen just pull "facts" straight out of thin air?




As the kids would say: embarrassing much?

 

[acbytesla]

Vixen's arguments are time and again shown to be inaccurate and/or ludicrous, but Vixen persists. None so blind......
....but the jokes on us...we persist when we should turn away to things more sane.

It reminds me of the movie Spaceballs. We're traveling at ludicrous speed.

Virtually every single one of her posts are false and we think that if we prove each one wrong she'll stop. But she'll never stop she'll just start back at the beginning. Instead of Whack a Mole, it's Whack a lie.

 

[acbytesla]

I have to ask: does Vixen just pull "facts" straight out of thin air?

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/4023755f97f0f0f769.jpg[/qimg]


As the kids would say: embarrassing much?

Why would she be embarrassed LJ? It's not like she values truth.

 

[Grinder]

No shoe was ever recovered that matched the so-called Rudy print.

Rudy admitted throwing his (bloody) shoes away in Germany.

I, for one, am happy that you finally accept it wasn't Raf's.

Vixen did Marasca or any prosecution person object to Massei's kindness?

 

[Grinder]

Let me get this right. I'd hate to misquote you. You're saying that Amanda had special knowledge of the crime scene because she and the police both knew that Meredith's body was meant to be put inside the wardrobe?

Is this a psychic investigation?

Tesla, Tesla, Tesla,

The knew this just like they knew what she told them was correct after she buckled on November the 5th.

 

[Grinder]

I'm currently in the 12-step program dealing with Vixen!

How far along are you? Step minus one?

Does the forum allow one person to post the same pictures unlimited times?

 

[js202]

Strictly as a hypothetical, the last several months here cause one to wonder:

If the smart posters here were professionally informed that they were ceaselessly interacting with a confirmed delusional personality with indications of grandiosity, would they continue to respond?

 

[Bill Williams]

Strictly as a hypothetical, the last several months here cause one to wonder:

If the smart posters here were professionally informed that they were ceaselessly interacting with a confirmed delusional personality with indications of grandiosity, would they continue to respond?

So the issue is - who is dumber?

 

[Bill Williams]

How far along are you? Step minus one?

Does the forum allow one person to post the same pictures unlimited times?

Apparently. They're good shots!

 

[Kauffer]

I have to ask: does Vixen just pull "facts" straight out of thin air?

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/4023755f97f0f0f769.jpg[/qimg]


As the kids would say: embarrassing much?

Lol!

 

[bagels]

Strictly as a hypothetical, the last several months here cause one to wonder:

If the smart posters here were professionally informed that they were ceaselessly interacting with a confirmed delusional personality with indications of grandiosity, would they continue to respond?

If I could resist arguing with delusional people I would have never gotten interested in this case.

 

[acbytesla]

Tesla, Tesla, Tesla,

The knew this just like they knew what she told them was correct after she buckled on November the 5th.

Oh yeah. Everything was wrong then as well. My bad.

 

[acbytesla]

I'm currently in the 12-step program dealing with Vixen!

Michael Corleone: Just when I thought I was out... they pull me back in.

 

[Mr Fied]

Hehehehe brilliant stuff!

Incidentally, do you know what mass of Sollecito's DNA was allegedly discovered on Kercher's bra clasp? (Hint: you might want to revisit your ludicrous use of the term "massive" ) Oh, and do you have any idea about what the ultimate SC report said about this "evidence", and whether or not it could be considered reliable and/or admissible? And the same about the bathmat partial print?

Is the answer a boulder?

 

[Bill Williams]

Ok - one more Italian language opinion, so far virtually unanimous, from a webservice called "volando contro vento", offered to those who only accidentally scan these things, then remark in detail on how betrayed and lied to they feel.......

This one from Sept 9, two days after the publication of the Marasca report. Note some things - there's absolutely no mention of what "forte sospetto" means, nor any of the other alleged conradictory stuff Machiavelli implies is so compelling.... when Marasca's report read in the original language.

http://albatros-volandocontrovento.blogspot.it/2015/09/con-le-motivazioni-knox-sollecito-la.html

Once again, if someone can find an Italian language commentary - blog, mainstream news - which is blowing the lid off a corrupt Marasca Section of the ISC, please post it here.

Instead, what we have is......

But that's not all, because finally the Supreme Court has also openly admitted that the media have a crucial role in the conduct of investigations that just because of the media pressure that makes you want to do everything in a hurry, they end up being spasmodic and consequently poorly-made and approximate. But still not enough, because he finally slapped even those who worked and still work in the scientific field, in that institution supported and revered both by the prosecutor that the television commentators, in that institution that in this case (which will be the touchstone for other cases to be treated) has poorly-reperted and poorly-preserved artifacts and did not use the right skills in the analysis. Last but not least, he finally slapped the judges that have preceded it in judicial decisions. Judges that rather than perform for how he wanted the law have convicted or returned to another location based on personal prejudices without even considering the logic and the penal code.​

 

[acbytesla]

Ok - one more Italian language opinion, so far virtually unanimous, from a webservice called "volando contro vento", offered to those who only accidentally scan these things, then remark in detail on how betrayed and lied to they feel.......

This one from Sept 9, two days after the publication of the Marasca report. Note some things - there's absolutely no mention of what "forte sospetto" means, nor any of the other alleged conradictory stuff Machiavelli implies is so compelling.... when Marasca's report read in the original language.

http://albatros-volandocontrovento.blogspot.it/2015/09/con-le-motivazioni-knox-sollecito-la.html

Once again, if someone can find an Italian language commentary - blog, mainstream news - which is blowing the lid off a corrupt Marasca Section of the ISC, please post it here.

Instead, what we have is......

​

No, say it isn't so! It just can't be! I was sure that the Italian people would rise up and defend the integrity of Mignini and Giiobbi et al. Surely the Italian people understand the importance of protecting their great judicial institution from this attack from within.

 

[Vixen]

I have to ask: does Vixen just pull "facts" straight out of thin air?

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/4023755f97f0f0f769.jpg[/qimg]


As the kids would say: embarrassing much?

OK, fair enough. So the wardrobe's not inbuilt, as I read somewhere.

Nonetheless, it doesn't change the thrust of the prima facie evidence Amanda bragged of special knowledge of the crime.

Perhaps you can explain why and how Rudy came back to move and undress the body.

 

[Bill Williams]

No, say it isn't so! It just can't be! I was sure that the Italian people would rise up and defend the integrity of Mignini and Giiobbi et al. Surely the Italian people understand the importance of protecting their great judicial institution from this attack from within.

Shaken by Grinder's skepticism - on a skeptic's site yet - I'm now doing his work for him. On a mission to find public voices which diss Marasca in Italian.... Machiavelli won't do it and Grinder now has me sufficiently cowed with his arrow-like scannings of this stuff......

Strangely, we're still on for coffee. This is what I get for not buying him dinner!

 

[acbytesla]

OK, fair enough. So the wardrobe's not inbuilt, as I read somewhere.

Nonetheless, it doesn't change the thrust of the prima facie evidence Amanda bragged of special knowledge of the crime.

Perhaps you can explain why and how Rudy came back to move and undress the body.

When are you going to get this straight? Or do you insist on LYING about it for the rest of your life? Amanda DIDN'T have special knowledge of the crime!

 

[anglolawyer]

When are you going to get this straight? Or do you insist on LYING about it for the rest of your life? Amanda DIDN'T have special knowledge of the crime!

What gave her away was saying the body was found in the in-built wardrobe. When the cops failed to find the in-built wardrobe, after days of searching, they knew they were onto something. Theft of in-built wardrobes is one of the most serious offences in the Italian lexicon. The search continues ...