• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Moderated JFK conspiracy theories: it never ends III

Status
Not open for further replies.
Robert Harris said:
So, you cannot provide a verbatim example of evidence which is only "mine"??
Click to expand...
Do as you were instructed.

Perhaps I can help you out here.

Were the WC's conclusions about the large consensus of witnesses only mine and not yours?

Were the visible, simultaneous reactions only mine and not yours?

Were the analyses of Drs. Alvarez and Stroscio, only mine and not yours?

Were the sworn testimonies of the people we see reacting, only mine and not yours?

I don't have my own evidence. The evidence I present is verifiable and beyond dispute. You may present your own conclusions of course, in the unlikely event that you ever address this evidence, but you won't get away with pretending that the evidence is not EVERYONE'S.
Click to expand...

#72 - Fringe Reset - Just like every other CTist.

You've been told where you are lacking.
 
RoboTimbo said:
Do as you were instructed.



#72 - Fringe Reset - Just like every other CTist.

You've been told where you are lacking.
Click to expand...

I have been "told" more idiotic things around here than Alice in Wonderland.

Are my questions too difficult for you?

When are you going to prove your assertion that I rely on evidence which no one else recognizes?

Or you ready to finally do the right thing and admit that you are wrong?
 
JayUtah said:
The only "tactic" I am resorting to is not playing the rhetorical game you have laid out. I have examined your claims and I have drawn my conclusions regarding their credibility. I have drawn further conclusions regarding how likely you are to respond to further engagement.

If you wish to understand the reasons behind those conclusions, please re-read the preceding 50 or so pages.
Click to expand...

Stop trying to change the subject.

What "other evidence" were you referring to, that refutes a shot at 285?

What evidence did I present which only I can see?

Your endless, phony assertions get tiresome, just like your excuses for why you can't address the evidence or even your own accusations.
 
JayUtah said:
When you re-read the preceding 50 pages.
Click to expand...

Were you thinking that only I can recognize what the Warren Commission said about the people who actually heard those shots?

..a substantial majority of the witnesses stated that the shots were not evenly spaced. Most witnesses recalled that the second and third shots were bunched together.

At one point during the hearings, Warren Commissioner Allen Dulles noted the overwhelming consistency of these witnesses, when he described the ratio of those confirming that shooting scenario in comparison with others,

There has been a certain amount of testimony indicating there was a longer pause between the report of the first shot... and the second and third shots, that is not absolutely unanimous but I would say it is something like 5 to 1 or something of that kind..

I think that's everyone's evidence, don't you Jay?

I think it's YOUR evidence too.
 
Robert Harris said:
Stop trying to change the subject.

What "other evidence" were you referring to, that refutes a shot at 285?

What evidence did I present which only I can see?

Your endless, phony assertions get tiresome, just like your excuses for why you can't address the evidence or even your own accusations.
Click to expand...

Do not continue to mistake me for someone who is playing your game. I have stated numerous times that I have already made up my mind regarding your claims.

Robert Harris said:
Were you thinking that only I can recognize what the Warren Commission said about the people who actually heard those shots?

..a substantial majority of the witnesses stated that the shots were not evenly spaced. Most witnesses recalled that the second and third shots were bunched together.

At one point during the hearings, Warren Commissioner Allen Dulles noted the overwhelming consistency of these witnesses, when he described the ratio of those confirming that shooting scenario in comparison with others,

There has been a certain amount of testimony indicating there was a longer pause between the report of the first shot... and the second and third shots, that is not absolutely unanimous but I would say it is something like 5 to 1 or something of that kind..

I think that's everyone's evidence, don't you Jay?

I think it's YOUR evidence too.
Click to expand...

I am not playing your game. Do not attempt to compensate for that by putting words in my mouth. Deal with the fact that I have made up my mind.
 
JayUtah said:
When you re-read the preceding 50 pages.
Click to expand...

Do you think that this is ONLY my evidence, Jay? I think it's everyone's evidence, don't you?

http://jfkhistory.com/ducking.gif

People here, initially claimed that this was the result of the limo passengers being thrown around because Greer slammed on the brakes. Do you agree with them?

Or are you going to say that you can't even agree with your buddies, since that is just my "game":D

This is what we need to be debating, Jay. In fact, it is the ONLY thing we need to debate, to resolve the question of conspiracy in the JFK case.
 
JayUtah said:
Do not continue to mistake me for someone who is playing your game. I have stated numerous times that I have already made up my mind regarding your claims.



I am not playing your game. Do not attempt to compensate for that by putting words in my mouth. Deal with the fact that I have made up my mind.
Click to expand...

I cannot put words in your mouth by asking a question. All that can make you do is fabricate more phony excuses.

You need to confess that you made blatantly false statements, Jay. I don't care if you lie about me personally, but you won't get away with distorting the facts and evidence, associated with this crime.
 
Last edited:
Robert Harris said:
I cannot put words in your mouth by asking a question. All that can make you do is fabricate more phony excuses.

You need to confess that you made blatantly false statements, Jay. I don't care if you lie about me personally, but you won't get away with distorting the facts and evidence.
Click to expand...

No, I don't need to play any incarnation of your game. Deal with the fact that I have made up my mind regarding your claims.
 
JayUtah said:
No, I don't need to play any incarnation of your game. Deal with the fact that I have made up my mind regarding your claims.
Click to expand...

You made up your mind!?!

How shocking is that?

Now let's address those dishonest statements you made.

Do you intend to admit that you were wrong, or do I have to continue to challenge you?
 
Last edited:
Robert Harris said:
Stop trying to change the subject.

What "other evidence" were you referring to, that refutes a shot at 285?

What evidence did I present which only I can see?

Your endless, phony assertions get tiresome, just like your excuses for why you can't address the evidence or even your own accusations.
Click to expand...

Still waiting Jay.

I will continue to ask, until you answer.
 
Robert Harris said:
I have been "told" more idiotic things around here than Alice in Wonderland.

Are my questions too difficult for you?

When are you going to prove your assertion that I rely on evidence which no one else recognizes?

Or you ready to finally do the right thing and admit that you are wrong?
Click to expand...

Read the preceding 50 pages as you were advised. Report back with your results. Address your homework first. Your fringe reset spam may work at the CT loon sites.
 
RoboTimbo said:
Read the preceding 50 pages as you were advised. Report back with your results. Address your homework first. Your fringe reset spam may work at the CT loon sites.
Click to expand...

Are my questions too difficult for you?

When are you going to prove your assertion that I rely on evidence which no one else recognizes?

You just made that up, didn't you Robo?
 
#54 - Run away from sharing your entire loony alternative hypothesis since it embarrasses you.

Just like every other CTist.
 
RoboTimbo said:
#54 - Run away from sharing your entire loony alternative hypothesis since it embarrasses you.

Just like every other CTist.
Click to expand...

OK, since those questions are too difficult for you, let's try another.

Do you think it was just a coincidence that Alvarez identified Zapruder's reaction at frames 290-291, while the limo passengers reacted at 290-292?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom