• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Boston Marathon bombing deniers -have they ever been able to prove their theories?

Tinfoil Hater

Graduate Poster
Tinfoil Hater
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
1,440
The most vile CTs Ive ever encountered in my life are the ones who think the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing was staged- Of course many of them sputter the usual CT drivel that they think the Jews did it, but some of them think none of it was real, the blood was all fake, etc

I found a truly vile conspiracy page that insited it was all fake. Really? I live in Boston and know people who wrere there, i saw the aftermath
Warning- this link had graphioc images of the Boston marathin bombing aftermath:


http://educate-yourself.org/cn/bostonbombingdidyouthink20apr13.shtml


With the death sentence issued against the terrorst bomber, the Boston Marathon bombing deniers are starting to surface, like an unflushed turd in the toiet bowl. What is interesting to me is that nearlly all of these Boston Marathon bombing deniers are also 9/11 truthers.

Have the Boston Marthon bombing deniers been able to use the scientiofic method to prove their claims with verifiable evidence- or did they pull their theories out of thin air?

A common tendency with many CTs is that they seem unfamilar with the scientific method.
 
Last edited:
Strangely the defense didn't use any of that sterling material to free their man.
 
I don't understand the question. You live in Boston and know people who were there, so I presume you have no doubt that the bombing was real.

So, are you asking whether someone has managed to prove something that you know for a fact is false?
 
Azrael 5 said:
True. Denying someone has had their leg blown off and was an amputee to begin with is both vile an insane. But the Sandy Hookers are the worst Id say.
Click to expand...

They're are equally as horrible, but the fact of the matter is there is nothing worse than the death of your own child.
 
phiwum said:
I don't understand the question. You live in Boston and know people who were there, so I presume you have no doubt that the bombing was real.

So, are you asking whether someone has managed to prove something that you know for a fact is false?
Click to expand...

Damnit, that's what I was going to say. Took the words right out of my brain. :)
 
No, I think the Sandy Hook truthers are way worse. The Boston bombing truthers are merely insane and making vague assertions. The Sandy Hook truthers almost certainly know what they are alleging is false but do it anyways because they are scared the truth might mean they lose their guns.

So you have insane people throwing out vague crap on one side and on the other side you have diabolical sociopaths lying through their teeth about the deaths of twenty kindergartners just so they can keep their guns.
 
Cluesforum has a particularly vile thread on this. No one has proved anything but they sure have made a lot of assertions.

As for the connection with truthers you'll have a hard time finding a CTer that doesn't subscribe to almost all conspiracy theories. If they don't outright believe them all they remain "open minded" to the pondering of others on almost any event. These "theories" reinforce each other. They will counter skepticism that the bombing was fake or staged by asserting that 9/11 was fake or staged.
 
A little off subject but not topic,have there ever been proven conspiracies? Not on scale of 9/11 etc obviously, but false flags etc? Let's say in peacetime?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom