This is something that always bugs me. Once again our nation's police murder someone and a city rises up against them. But all the media wants to talk about are looted stores. That's like covering the Warsaw uprising and only talking about how much it will cost to clean up all the bricks laying scattered about.
Is the media just lazy here or is this part of an agenda?
Maybe because the media has already reported all of the available information about the original event (the police killing). No new information about that event has become available, therefore nothing new to report.
Maybe because the message of the protests was reported on when (or even before) the protests began. That message has not changed and the actual protesters aren't doing or saying anything different than they were at the start, therefore nothing new to report.
News reporting is a business. They don't draw readers/viewers by repeating the same information over and over. Therefore they focus on the developing stories where new things are happening.
The riots and destruction are news that affect people both locally and nationally. Locally, regardless of underlying reasons, riots and looting affect people's daily lives. Nationally, it affects travel, business, entertainment (baseball) and concern about friends and relatives in the area. It's news. Protests also can affect some of these things, but not nearly to the extent of damage, destruction and violence.
And every story I've read about the looting refers to the protests and the underlying issue that sparked the situation.
That said, there is a place for stories on police/race relations. Such a story would probably be broad in scope and be more of an investigative piece. this is more of a 20/20 or Time magazine thing than a breaking news piece.