Merged Bigfoot follies

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is there anything about it that screams hoax other than the fact that it's a purported Bigfoot trackway?
 
Is there anything about it that screams hoax other than the fact that it's a purported Bigfoot trackway?

You mean other than the narrator poisoning the well a number of times; or there is no way to vet the various claims made (3 mile trackway); or the fact that there are zero (0) bigfeet at the end of any trackway ever? Or the fact that there a zero footies in evidence anywhere?

You mean like that?
 
Last edited:
How about this one? (I've posted this a couple of times already)


Animal with 4 legs bounding along in the snow makes tracks like these because they can't just walk in it very well. (all sorts of animals do this, not just deer or coyote, bears etc) Not like these have ever been been explained a gazillion times to bigfooters though. Also people do too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jlA_ZsyRc4
 
Last edited:
No doubt it's a known animal, I've always thought it might be a rabbit.
It's obvious the original tracks were laid down and then it snowed over those tracks as well as some melt and refreezing.
If these were original tracks where are the drag marks?

Here's what IMO should be present at any tracks laid down by a upright hominid walking in snow 3feet deep.
This is only 8".... Now how about telling me what made the crossing trackway, some of you may have seen this before...;)
 
Last edited:
The NAWAC has been conspicuously silent as of late.

However, they are still doing interviews for Swiss media evidently.

Note how they leave out the important parts of their stories, like the time they shot at a Bigfoot and almost killed a couple of kids? They left out the part with the kids.

You may have to use Google translate to read this.

http://www.aargauerzeitung.ch/leben...r-jagd-auf-den-mysterioesen-bigfoot-128763416

They do quote a Swiss Primatologist (Translated with Google)
Also for the primatologists Thomas Geissmann of the University of Zurich have such reports merely entertainment and no scientific value. "I do not for a moment that Bigfoot exists," says the monkey researcher who specializes in the gibbons. In addition, the apes were living in the tropical jungle. "Although I have not read the reports of NAWAC, but I know the allegations of Bigfoot researchers sufficiently They never convinced me."
 
Last edited:
Nah....LOL...this was in the Great Dismal Swamp not so remote but when I saw it cross behind me it did scare me since I had no idea what I was seeing.....first thought "was man that's a big snake"....second thought "whats a snake doing out in the snow"....third thought "man that was a big snake".
 
The NAWAC has been conspicuously silent as of late.

However, they are still doing interviews for Swiss media evidently.

Note how they leave out the important parts of their stories, like the time they shot at a Bigfoot and almost killed a couple of kids? They left out the part with the kids.

You may have to use Google translate to read this.

http://www.aargauerzeitung.ch/leben...r-jagd-auf-den-mysterioesen-bigfoot-128763416

They do quote a Swiss Primatologist (Translated with Google)

Well, their number is pretty much up there. Just given the new DNA extraction techniques alone, making wild claims about their Oklahoma ape wilderness is untenable.
 
Hey NL,

Why is it that bigfoot always walks like he is drunk? If you follow the path marking Left-Right-Left-Right, he keeps getting messed up and stepping across his body. This seems to be a common problem with footie when it snows.
 
Hey NL,

Why is it that bigfoot always walks like he is drunk? If you follow the path marking Left-Right-Left-Right, he keeps getting messed up and stepping across his body. This seems to be a common problem with footie when it snows.

That's because when it snows there is ice.
When there is ice they can have their special treats - martinis.
Shaken - not stirred - of course. :)
 
Hey NL, was that you featured on Season 2: Finding Bigfoot "Peeping Bigfoot" episode in Minnesota?

Renee mentioned a "candy tossing" incident, and the rest of the bits seem to fit your story.
 
Hey NL, was that you featured on Season 2: Finding Bigfoot "Peeping Bigfoot" episode in Minnesota?

Renee mentioned a "candy tossing" incident, and the rest of the bits seem to fit your story.

Yes and no. Yes, I was there and told a story on camera, but no, it wasn't the candy story. My story did not make the final cut, so it wasn't aired. I've watched that episode several times and I don't recall her saying anything, but it's possible. I never said it to her. Andy may have, he chatted with the crew for several hours during that time. He was the one that did the recording that prompted the show to come out. Here it is:

http://sasquatchresearchers.org/minnesota-howls-2009/
 
Yes and no. Yes, I was there and told a story on camera, but no, it wasn't the candy story. My story did not make the final cut, so it wasn't aired. I've watched that episode several times and I don't recall her saying anything, but it's possible. I never said it to her. Andy may have, he chatted with the crew for several hours during that time. He was the one that did the recording that prompted the show to come out. Here it is:

http://sasquatchresearchers.org/minnesota-howls-2009/

When they re-air old episodes, sometimes the cast of the show do these little narration speech bubbles that pop up to add their two bits to a particular scene. That's where the candy bit was mentioned.

Edit: Here ya go.

189F20BE-4BC3-4988-BBE9-E19C74372B23_zpsv6yig1sx.jpg
 
Last edited:
The activity the reported included ? These guys are in on it, and making typos on purpose, right? Do they say things like "I seen one?"
 
When they re-air old episodes, sometimes the cast of the show do these little narration speech bubbles that pop up to add their two bits to a particular scene. That's where the candy bit was mentioned.

Edit: Here ya go.

Ah, I see. She was combining a couple of different incidents. The candy was not thrown at the tents, but we did have berries thrown at our tent each of the three nights we were there. They were berries that were blue (not the edible blue berries) that grow along the ground and are pasty when broken open. This is the closest picture I could find:

images


The first night, we didn't know what it was. The leaves that hit would produce a scraping sound as they slid off the tent. The berries would roll off, making a very distinct noise. The second night, Dan counted many berries hitting as I slept. The third night, I heard several hitting the tent. Don't remember how many, but I counted. Need to consult my notes on exactly how many. In the morning, we would find the berries accumulated around the tent.

Andy must have told her of everything that happened and she mixed them up for the show.
 
It's nice to know that the great Boss-O'-the-Woods has managed to escape detection lo these many centuries by going out of its way to attract the attention of the creatures from which it's so desperately trying to hide.

#footerlogic
 
The first night, we didn't know what it was. The leaves that hit would produce a scraping sound as they slid off the tent. The berries would roll off, making a very distinct noise. The second night, Dan counted many berries hitting as I slept. The third night, I heard several hitting the tent. Don't remember how many, but I counted. Need to consult my notes on exactly how many. In the morning, we would find the berries accumulated around the tent.

Andy must have told her of everything that happened and she mixed them up for the show.

Gosh, must be footie. I've never known anyone to **** with campers in a tent. No, not at all. Wait, I used to do it all the time, especially with newbie campers. Bear noises, footsteps, howling, and yes, even throwing **** at tents.

Also, have you ever experienced a pissed-off squirrel dropping things on your tent? Never?

Honestly, do you get out much?

BTW: Nearly every single incident you've posted can be explained by folks having fun at your expense, or as a misinterpretation of man-made phenomena.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom