Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, we don't need to know them well. They're mythology. There are much better things to read.



No. If I get 26 weeks of vacation, I'm going to do things that *I* want to do, not things that *you* think I should do.



No. If I need to reference anything in those books, I will simply Google it. I'm not going to read all four books all the way through.

If all world people will know the texts of those greatest and most publicated 4 Book of 4 world religions they will have what to talk with each other about.
 
No. My skills require a high level of manual dexterity and concentration, and would deteriorate from disuse. Once I got back to the office I'd have to work harder than usual to get back to My usual level.

So you can't work successfully even for example one week and be free from your work in an other week and so on?
If your answer "yes" - weekly symmetrical lifestyle really not for you.
 
May be because I eat all this without whisky.
You think that 3 ounces (85 g) pinhead oatmeal with 2 tablespoons (35 ml) of whisky is equivalent to 4.4 lbs of buckwheat with no whisky? In other words, drinking 2 spoonfuls of whisky is the same as eating over 4 lbs of uncooked grain?

In Scotland we do not think that. At the arrival of the New Year we drink a glass of whisky, but I have never seen anyone consume a bucket of soaked pinhead oatmeal instead. That would be interesting to watch.
 
Absolutely not, because the inflation in "New Saturday" world will be near zero.
Inflation will be replaced by increasing of high quality consuming.

I wasn't talking about inflation I was talking about costs. If you increase wages for everyone you increase the cost of goods and services from that employer.
 
For example in French is forbidden to work more than 1500 hours a year.

Totally, utterly, and completely false. Since you had trouble figuring out how to use my previous link that called out your lack of knowledge on another issue, I'll make the link plain:

http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20140312-frances-mythic-35-hour-week

And give you a quote from the article:

Contrary to many stereotypes, 35-hours is “simply a threshold above which overtime or rest days start to kick in”, according to French economist Jean-Marie Perbost.

And another:

Olivier, a senior counsel in a large French multinational in the construction industry in Paris (he requested his surname not be used), described his workweek one recent evening in his office. “I work about 45 to 50 hours a week, from roughly 09:00 till 19:30,” he said.

A word of advice: people tend to be reluctant to fund multimillion dollar projects by people who can't get basic facts correct.
 
If all world people will know the texts of those greatest and most publicated 4 Book of 4 world religions they will have what to talk with each other about.

Why would I want to talk to everyone in the world about scriptures I don't even believe? I'd much rather talk about music or cooking or gardening (or knitting, or fishkeeping, or cat herding, or just about anything else).
 
So you can't work successfully even for example one week and be free from your work in an other week and so on?
If your answer "yes" - weekly symmetrical lifestyle really not for you.

It's not a matter of "I can't"; it's a matter of "I don't want to." I'd rather work for 2-3 months and then take a week off, then work for a couple of months and take another week off. I enjoy vacations more that way.

I also work only 5 days a week, not 6. I've tried working 6 days a week and didn't like it at all.
 
If you will keep your income - about
$ 40000 will you agree on weekly symmetrical lifestyle?

No, because the buying power of that $40,000 will not be the same. Your plan is a recipe for worldwide social disaster, with failed companies, diminished services, and a population suffering from poor nutrition and buckwheat-induced flatulopathy.
 
You think that 3 ounces (85 g) pinhead oatmeal with 2 tablespoons (35 ml) of whisky is equivalent to 4.4 lbs of buckwheat with no whisky? In other words, drinking 2 spoonfuls of whisky is the same as eating over 4 lbs of uncooked grain?

In Scotland we do not think that. At the arrival of the New Year we drink a glass of whisky, but I have never seen anyone consume a bucket of soaked pinhead oatmeal instead. That would be interesting to watch.

My organism produces about 2 lb of alkaloid in the equivalent of vodka.
Alcohol of better quality personally for me is impossible to create.
If I will drink vodka or every other external alcohol that we buy, my organism will not produce its internal alkaloid when I live free from eating 6 days a week.
 
I wasn't talking about inflation I was talking about costs. If you increase wages for everyone you increase the cost of goods and services from that employer.

You have to understand just one thing.
If the worker agree to work without increasing his real hour wage minimum on 3% a year he will not be fully respectable person.
Nobody will tell him about this of course, but everybody know this.
If employer can't to increase the hour real wage on 3% he has no right to be employer but he has right to be the free businessman of course.
 
Totally, utterly, and completely false. Since you had trouble figuring out how to use my previous link that called out your lack of knowledge on another issue, I'll make the link plain:

http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20140312-frances-mythic-35-hour-week

And give you a quote from the article:



And another:



A word of advice: people tend to be reluctant to fund multimillion dollar projects by people who can't get basic facts correct.

In French, Germany, Holland most people work 1500 hours a year and less.
If some employers force their staff to work more it is a violation of the law.
Those countries can go to weekly symmetrical lifestyle (the first block of my project) from today, because there is no principal difference in economic sense between 1500 working hours and 1248 working hours a year.
 
Why would I want to talk to everyone in the world about scriptures I don't even believe? I'd much rather talk about music or cooking or gardening (or knitting, or fishkeeping, or cat herding, or just about anything else).

Because we all are people of Abrahamic - Buddhist Civilization of those 4 Books that we refuse to read and because this is the most blood in the world!
 
It's not a matter of "I can't"; it's a matter of "I don't want to." I'd rather work for 2-3 months and then take a week off, then work for a couple of months and take another week off. I enjoy vacations more that way.

I also work only 5 days a week, not 6. I've tried working 6 days a week and didn't like it at all.

I didn't ask you what you want I asked you what you can.
It is clear me that you can live in for example one week job - one week creative vacation lifestyle without losing your professional skills.
 
No, because the buying power of that $40,000 will not be the same. Your plan is a recipe for worldwide social disaster, with failed companies, diminished services, and a population suffering from poor nutrition and buckwheat-induced flatulopathy.

If the buying power of that $40,000 will be the same or more than today, will you agree to live in job - creative vacation weekly symmetrical lifestyle?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom