• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

New TWA Flight 800 film coming out

Border Reiver said:
JB, if we accept your pet theory - that flight TWA800 was brought down by a missile - it would need to able to answer a number of questions better than the "official story."

a. What sort of missile;
b. How many missile(s);
c. Where was it/they fired from;
d. Who fired it/them;
e. Why is the damaged area of the plane damaged by an explosion going outwards from underneath the plane;
f. Why didn't the missile show up on a radar track prior to TWA 800 being damaged;
g. Where are the fragments of the missile body and guidance system; and
h. What does anyone gain by covering it up?
Click to expand...

Still waiting.
 
Jetblast said:
Except for the numerous pellets he removed from the victims that tested positive as US missile warhead incendiary pellets.
Click to expand...
What pellets are these? :rolleyes:

Jetblast said:
This is silly. You are just taking advantage of semantics, coercion, and criminal cover-up reality.
Click to expand...
There you go, I've fixed that for you.

Jetblast said:
I won this debate long ago, as answers like yours prove.
Click to expand...
Danth's Law.

Border Reiver said:
Still waiting.
Click to expand...
I suspect we'll be waiting a long time for TB to mature enough to actually answer.
 
Last edited:
These questions are so good they deserve repeating:

Originally Posted by Border Reiver View Post
JB, if we accept your pet theory - that flight TWA800 was brought down by a missile - it would need to able to answer a number of questions better than the "official story."

a. What sort of missile;
b. How many missile(s);
c. Where was it/they fired from;
d. Who fired it/them;
e. Why is the damaged area of the plane damaged by an explosion going outwards from underneath the plane;
f. Why didn't the missile show up on a radar track prior to TWA 800 being damaged;
g. Where are the fragments of the missile body and guidance system; and
h. What does anyone gain by covering it up?
Click to expand...
 
Jetblast said:
... that tested positive as US missile warhead incendiary pellets.
...
I won this debate long ago, ...
Click to expand...
When spreading silly dumbed down lies is the goal; you are the winner.

Where is your Pulitzer? Oh, no evidence? Only big talk. lol
 
Jetblast said:
Except for the numerous pellets he removed from the victims that tested positive as US missile warhead incendiary pellets
Click to expand...
You keep making this claim but have yet to provide anything to support it. Why?

Jetblast said:
The fact BenjaminTR ignores all the evidence and airs the propaganda of the violators as his sole entry proves the cover-up.
Just watch the new documentary. The fact BenjaminTR is forced to ignore all its evidence is proof that it is evidence.
Click to expand...
You seem to have a different idea of what constitutes "proof" than most other people.
 
Bump. As JB has returned and is posting elsewhere, will he have the courage to return to this thread and answer the questions put to him?
 
JB please address these questions then the discussion can proceed in a credible manner:

Originally Posted by Border Reiver View Post
JB, if we accept your pet theory - that flight TWA800 was brought down by a missile - it would need to able to answer a number of questions better than the "official story."

a. What sort of missile;
b. How many missile(s);
c. Where was it/they fired from;
d. Who fired it/them;
e. Why is the damaged area of the plane damaged by an explosion going outwards from underneath the plane;
f. Why didn't the missile show up on a radar track prior to TWA 800 being damaged;
g. Where are the fragments of the missile body and guidance system; and
h. What does anyone gain by covering it up?
Click to expand...
 
Well all the other kids are saying it, so I will too!

Originally Posted by Border Reiver View Post
JB, if we accept your pet theory - that flight TWA800 was brought down by a missile - it would need to able to answer a number of questions better than the "official story."

a. What sort of missile;
b. How many missile(s);
c. Where was it/they fired from;
d. Who fired it/them;
e. Why is the damaged area of the plane damaged by an explosion going outwards from underneath the plane;
f. Why didn't the missile show up on a radar track prior to TWA 800 being damaged;
g. Where are the fragments of the missile body and guidance system; and
h. What does anyone gain by covering it up?
Click to expand...
 
ISTR a photo of a drone flying in the area at that time. At least, a light in the sky that was said to be a drone.. which if examined for location and direction was flying away from the location of the incident, and over Long Island.
And, when correlated with the other real aviation activity in the area at the time, was most likely the left wing tip light of the NY ANG C-130 operating at Gabreski airport.
 
I have a huge file on TWA 800 and there are many problems with the accounts of this accident.

1. The case is still open.

While ordering all Boeing 747-100 aircraft to rewire all assemblies outside the CWT there is no proof that this was the cause of the spark. No one likes reports that use terms like 'inconclusive' and 'precise location' and-the oldie but goodie-'firm evidence of the explosive spark may never be known'

2. The Autopsy reports.

I guess I will always get a case of the screaming horrors every time I try to make some sense of how persons could have drown with no impact injuries whatsoever.
The complete Autopsy Summaries was released October 17th 1997 under the title of ACCIDENT DCA-96-MA-070 of The National Archives. It is long and highly detailed-and or-highly technical and is troubling in two aspects. First, the procedures to process and identify all 230 recovered bodies took precedence over evidence collection. One is left to assume that the Bureau all ready had their conclusion of impact ordnance and simply wanted to appease the public by returning the remains quickly to families for burial. This process was delayed by attempts to create a system of 'data mapping' using GIS-geographical information system and Microsoft Access Version 7.0 in order to assist 'future investigations'

I think I can speak for everyone in saying that 'this is not the time or the place for classroom experiments of academic pursuits'

More bungling.

The first 98 bodies were recovered within 12-24 hours mostly from those that floated to the surface of the Atlantic. These bodies were then stored and left waiting-a substantial number of further recoveries-so a new system of 'processing' could be experimented with.

The system of randomly picked Medical Examiners from the surrounding jurisdictions were assigned to each of the 5 'cutting boards' (autopsy tables)in order to process clothing-visual-radioscopy-injuries-location and finally seat location. This 'new' system was evaluated by Colonel Shanahan MD MPH US Army Forensic research Laboratory with the following statement.

"The thoroughness of the forensic post-mortem examinations was highly variable depending primarily upon the Pathologist and the 'case flow' (assuming the musical chairs setup of the 'cutting boards') and were told not to 'preform a detailed forensic examination beyond identity".

This is just not acceptable:

You have 96% of the Aircraft recovered and you keep investigating until you find the cause of the spark.

You don't play diddle-wattle with the remains of accident victims in order to produce a "better flowing bureaucratic exercise"

There is so much more to this however I'm not sure how many interested people would want to continue with it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom