• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Truthers produce deceptive look-alike brochure for 9/11 Memorial Museum opening

gmanontario said:
I was at the memorial and the preview museum last Saturday and not a truther twat in sight. :)

Hopefully the park authorities won't allow them to pester people like they used to the last time I was there in 2010.

Actually I was hoping I saw one and if they tried to speak with me I would have been very unfriendly and probably used unasterisked words.

I loved NYC this time, especially Central Park in the sunshine.:)
Click to expand...

That's pretty good you got to visit so soon. At least you didn't have the pleasure in encountering any twoofers loafing around. Hopefully, park officials are doing just that by keeping them out.

NYC during the warmer months is nice. Especially, in the fall.
 
Playing Games said:
Just finished reading the Ventura/Woods thread on the FB page ReThink911. A lot of detailed comments by someone calling himself Alan Haire. Can someone rectify to whom he is?

Since I live and breathe NYC every day of my life. I am planning a trip to The 911 Memorial Museum. If one of those A&E Truthers approaches me with one of those whacky brochures, I guarantee you I will tell them to, "get the....out of here" and throw it right back in their face. This is one New Yorker that bites!
Click to expand...

No say nothing to them just take a brochure and walk by. Then a few minutes later walk past them again and take another. That way you deprive other people of these brochures.
 
rjh01 said:
No say nothing to them just take a brochure and walk by. Then a few minutes later walk past them again and take another. That way you deprive other people of these brochures.
Click to expand...

Offer to help pass a bunch out and toss them in the garbage. :D
 
Georgio said:
I don't think it was. I thought it was very one-sided. They didn't say what any of the claims made by AE911Truth actually were and simply dismissed them out of hand as 'crazy' and 'false'.
Click to expand...
They have no "side". This is what happens when you "just ask questions" and don't actually do any work.

They have not supported one piece of what they call "evidence" since they started. Why would anyone want to start listening or giving them credit now?
 
Georgio said:
I don't think it was. I thought it was very one-sided. They didn't say what any of the claims made by AE911Truth actually were and simply dismissed them out of hand as 'crazy' and 'false'.
Click to expand...

So, they pretty much nailed it right on the head then.

Look, you guys have had almost 13 years to get people to listen to you and take your claims seriously. You can't even all agree on exactly what happened that day; all you have is nitpicking irrelevant minutiae and bamboozling people with technobabble.
 
thedopefishlives said:
Look, you guys have had almost 13 years to get people to listen to you and take your claims seriously. You can't even all agree on exactly what happened that day; all you have is nitpicking irrelevant minutiae and bamboozling people with technobabble.
Click to expand...

That's why they need your tax deductible donation to ask for an independent investigation with all the answers. The actual questions are not important, it's the need to ask and raise funds to do so.


:boxedin:
 
Justin39640 said:
Offer to help pass a bunch out and toss them in the garbage. :D
Click to expand...

rjh01 said:
No say nothing to them just take a brochure and walk by. Then a few minutes later walk past them again and take another. That way you deprive other people of these brochures.
Click to expand...

That was my thinking too. Take a huge ream or two, walk a few blocks, turn the corner, and chuck 'em into the old garbage pale. Better yet, maybe there is a recyclable bin next to it. Wasted paper turned back into something useful.
 
Back in the day when I was in middle school my friend would pass by people handing out brochures for stores. He would avoid the one in their hand and say "i want - that one!" and grab one near the bottom of the stack the distributor was holding in their hands. Odds were that a bunch of pamphlets would go flying.

He was being an *** but the tactic has some value against these morons. The only problem is the litter generation.
 
The comments on Disquis petered out a week ago but the devil in me, or perhaps I was assigned the task as a paid shill, decided that the last post couldn't be by a truther. So I posted to it today.;)
 
Georgio said:
I don't think it was. I thought it was very one-sided. They didn't say what any of the claims made by AE911Truth actually were and simply dismissed them out of hand as 'crazy' and 'false'.
Click to expand...
All of 911 truth claims are idiotic claptrap.

"non of this is true, it is all crazy talk" Wow, CNN got something right.

911 truth is a fringe group of nuts who disrespect those who died on 911 by making up fantasy, and ignoring the real murders, 19 terrorists. 911 truth, a movement of ignorance and gullibility.
 
Georgio said:
I don't think it was. I thought it was very one-sided. They didn't say what any of the claims made by AE911Truth actually were and simply dismissed them out of hand as 'crazy' and 'false'.
Click to expand...

Richard Gage and company have been spouting the same idiotic ideas about 9/11 for years now, despite being long debunked. In other words its the same stuff in a new package.
 
Georgio said:
I don't think it was. I thought it was very one-sided. They didn't say what any of the claims made by AE911Truth actually were and simply dismissed them out of hand as 'crazy' and 'false'.
Click to expand...

There is no reason at all to include Gage's tired old myths that were wrong when they were first uttered by DR Griffin ten years ago and are just as wrong now.

Spreading those lies would be bad journalism and a clear case of false balance.

(Link discusses false balance in the media in relation to anti-vaccine myths, but the criticism applies to coverage of all bad ideas.)
 
Orphia Nay said:
Spreading those lies would be bad journalism and a clear case of false balance.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure. If the CNN report was taking the advice of that Guardian article (very interesting by the way - thanks for the link) then they wouldn't have covered the story at all. This wasn't a story about building collapses or terrorist acts but one specifically about AE911Truth.

Either CNN shouldn't have covered the story at all or they should have covered what the AE911Truth claims actually were, i.e., covered the story properly. This CNN report was telling the audience to form a negative opinion on AE911Truth and not to worry about the specifics of any of the claims before forming it.
 
Georgio said:
I'm not sure. If the CNN report was taking the advice of that Guardian article (very interesting by the way - thanks for the link) then they wouldn't have covered the story at all. This wasn't a story about building collapses or terrorist acts but one specifically about AE911Truth.

Either CNN shouldn't have covered the story at all or they should have covered what the AE911Truth claims actually were, i.e., covered the story properly. This CNN report was telling the audience to form a negative opinion on AE911Truth and not to worry about the specifics of any of the claims before forming it.
Click to expand...

CNN has a negative view of AE911Truth. No where in the books does it say a news agency has to report both sides. It's called free press.

A report about AE is not news, It's filler and fluff.
 
Georgio said:
I'm not sure. If the CNN report was taking the advice of that Guardian article (very interesting by the way - thanks for the link) then they wouldn't have covered the story at all. This wasn't a story about building collapses or terrorist acts but one specifically about AE911Truth.

Either CNN shouldn't have covered the story at all or they should have covered what the AE911Truth claims actually were, i.e., covered the story properly. This CNN report was telling the audience to form a negative opinion on AE911Truth and not to worry about the specifics of any of the claims before forming it.
Click to expand...

And what is Dick telling us?

http://youtu.be/QNOR5FiC-7c
 
Georgio said:
I'm not sure. If the CNN report was taking the advice of that Guardian article (very interesting by the way - thanks for the link) then they wouldn't have covered the story at all. This wasn't a story about building collapses or terrorist acts but one specifically about AE911Truth.

Either CNN shouldn't have covered the story at all or they should have covered what the AE911Truth claims actually were, i.e., covered the story properly. This CNN report was telling the audience to form a negative opinion on AE911Truth and not to worry about the specifics of any of the claims before forming it.
Click to expand...

Yes, CNN should have exposed Gage as a fraud, a liar, an anti-American nut. AE911truth is a group of failed negative people who apologize with lies for 19 murderers who did 911. 911 truth can't figure out 911 given the answers, and Gage is making money selling fantasy, spreading lies, and fooling nuts like the Boston Bombers, people too dumbed down to understand reality.
 
Spanx said:
And what is Dick telling us?

http://youtu.be/QNOR5FiC-7c
Click to expand...
That they have to lie so their intended audience will pay attention to them and continue to give them money?

ETA: I liked how they said they "have been getting a lot of media attention". They got a fill piece where they were panned as kooks.

Is there any doubt they are just an internet oddity only?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom