Doghouse Reilly
Adrift on an uncharted sea
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2003
- Messages
- 3,418
Well yes, but the name is a little deceiving. One might get the impression from the phrase "anti-PUA" that these people have some kind of ideological opposition to PUAs - say, their objectification of women, maybe; but the truth is, the only problem that anti-PUA sites actually have with PUAs is that the latter's techniques for scoring vagina aren't effective.
The site PUAhate.com doesn't seem to be working anymore; but here's an editorial from a couple of years ago describing the site.
The PUAhate site has only been temporarily taken down, until this "blows over."
I've spent a lot of time on that site over the past few years, because I find the discussions of attraction and facial aesthetics that take place there to be quite interesting (there are many threads about what makes a face attractive, etc).
The philosophy of the main forum at the PUAhate site, in a nutshell, is that PUAs are scammers and hucksters because they claim that their techniques work, when in actuality all attraction is based on LMS, which means looks (in terms of handsomeness and masculinity), money, and status, and that women are only attracted to the top 20% or so of men with the best looks, money, and status. The site is a mix of bitter "incels" who claim to be incapable of success with women because of their lack of looks, money, or status, and other members who are actively trying to improve their LMS to achieve better success.
Obviously there are aspects of truth in the discussions that go on there, but they take things too far and extrapolate extreme examples (female attraction to top male models/celebrities/billionaires) into applications to everyday life that are just not justified.
It's also a site with a lot of trolling, so it's sometimes hard to know what people are serious about.
Last edited: