Continuation Part Eight: Discussion of the Amanda Knox/Raffaele Sollecito case

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rudy Wasn't Identified Via Palmprint or Fingerprint

The palmprint comparison only confirmed an identification that had already been made. They didn't have the ability to do a computerized match. Also, note how they knew to look for a "third" guy: because the initial round of forensics told them that Sollecito and Lumumba didn't do it.

Alberto Intini:

QUESTION - How was the Guede you know?

ANSWER - I can tell you the scientific part, that no investigation.

QUESTION - Of course.

ANSWER - I remember the first analysis of various biological samples was found a male DNA profile that did not correspond to the period investigated, two of which were male. In particular, a genetic profile was extracted from the full repertata detected and toilet paper in the toilet of one of two bathrooms, and even if I am wrong on the vaginal swab done to the victim. It seems to me only on these two, I would not be wrong, however, revealed a profile of a man, as biologists use to write in the report, 1 man, that did not correspond to the two. So we took cognizance that the crime scene, with a role that he would be assessed and of course there was definitely a different man from the two, as the third, as the second did not interest us and then there was the need to understand the investigative plan to which we told who it was. Simultaneously there was an activity of other operators, the fingerprint, which Boemio which is always mentioned with regard to a palmprint in blood on the pillow where he was the victim rested, good enough to be on a pillow that is obviously not as good a support surface of a solid, smooth, a palmprint that was identified by her fingerprints to the card then found the suspect Rudy Guede.

QUESTION - This print was evident palmprint?

ANSWER - Evident in what sense? On a technical level and it was obvious enough to make a fingerprint comparison, as the engineers say, have identified more than enough points on the case law to consider the identity of this palmprint of blood on the pillow and the palmprint on the tag of Rudy Guede. Rather, I want to be more precise, we say the comparison is made on suspicion, not that we have identified the palmprint from the impression. Among the various suspects, I cannot remember in what capacity, the mobile also indicated Rudy Guede, taking his card there was a confrontation between the palmprint ink on the tag fotodattiloscopico Rudy Guede and the imprint of blood and identity was given on the right points, at least, certainly more than 15.

QUESTION - But it could be done through the AFIS?

ANSWER - It is an interesting question because the AFIS is the fingerprint, we also have the APIS is the palmprint and then of AFIS we have an automated response only on digital. On the palmprint there is another part that is more recent, three or four years, there is only one million palmprints on the cards that we have the dates but we only have one million base compared to nine million digital so it's a database that is under development, deployment, but not yet complete. So do not give us response efficacy and self as it gives the AFIS for digital, then automatically we could not have an answer for the identification of the palmprint. We arrived for a comparison, I suspect, as we did with the other, on a subject then was the right one identity reported by the Flying Squad.

QUESTION - At the moment, thanks
 
Last edited:
Not in Italy
This is so outrageous.
On IIP I noted that that Kercher lawyer was BRAGGING in an interview that he was sure that AK & RS were dooomed because of this conviction without representation. He seemed proud of it.

Are there any cases where a convicted murderer and rapist is allowed to continue roaming the streets after a conviction? I have a feeling that this is all show and they are looking for a way to shut this off that makes the prosecution still look good.
 
Tesla you seem to have reading comprehension problems. I don't accept Rudi's word about the scream. I don't accept Rudi's word about trying to save Meredith. I do accept Rudi saying Amanda wasn't there.

I don't as you did that Rudi was so unattractive that Meredith could never consider dating him or whatever one wants to call it. I do think it is possible that he had a meetup arranged or that he thought he did. I doubt the girls remembered much of the later hours of the night before.

As usual you jump to your own limited experiences. First off the new information RW brought to the table does engender new thought for people not fixated on only one possibility. With your wide experiences of all things criminal because you know a cop, do burglars that are poor and need to make a rent payment hold onto the stolen items or do they sell them.

There doesn't seem to be any doubt that Rudi did have someone let him in and I think paid him.
????? What are you talking about?
Maybe old Rudi had a little more cash than you think. Do you have any proof that he was indeed short of cash for rent?

Just because he has stolen items does not mean he can sell them. Keep in mind that Rudy said he broke into the nursery because he didn't have the 30 Euros to stay at a hostel...not that 30 Euros would be required.

From my perspective, not my cop friend, Rudy's stories are absurd and self serving. Hey, even ugly guys get laid, hell, even I have gotten lucky a few times, so while it is possible that Rudy had a date with Meredith...although very far fetched and not confirmed by anyone.

It is also possible that while he was on a date with this new girl, 30 minutes after his arrival, he excused himself to take a dump in the bathroom farthest away from Meredith's room, fell asleep on the toilet and then someone knocked on the door and Meredith let that person in and the stranger killed Meredith and Rudy came out and fought with him and the guy left.

Just as it is possible that Rudy bought a laptop that was stolen about 3 blocks from his home two weeks earlier in a city 282 miles away. Want to buy some swamp land? More likely is that Rudy wanted to sell the laptop while he was in Milan. And the fact that Rudy had computers in his apartment at home means that he is far more likely to be a seller ..NOT a buyer.
 
Hey AC,
Someone, per Rudy,
Rang The Doorbell!

They did not knock...

Why the heck would Amanda ring the doorbell to her own residence?
And why the heck would Meredith open her doorway late on a night she was all alone,
with the music earphones that CodyJuneau recently pointed out, still in her ears?

Keep in mind that there was a person spotted outside in the garden in the week before Miss Kercher's brutal death.
Once by her, and another time by someone else too. By all accounts MK was concerned about this.

If Meredith was the least bit worried that night,
surely she would have closed and locked the front door security bars, right?
What am I talkin' about? Watch the crime scene video:
https://mega.co.nz/#!O4Zh3QxY!MLLxQsnTnxYs-zyAwlsjoak4-yw9QIPILsefu8ZDq08

For some reason
(maybe because we always did it to at my old surfshop in "DogTown")
I've felt that MK would have locked the front security bars too that night,
the 1st night she ever spent all all alone in her Italian villa.
Guede surely woulda had a hard time exiting then...
 
Last edited:
Don't tell me Nadeau wrote that P.O.S. directed by Brit Shill Winterbottom?

I am curious as to who will play Mignini? Since thy never caught the monster, its tough to see how they will portray it. My guess is like Zodiac'.

Barbie released a lot of pics of herself just hangin' with her gal-pal Kate Beckinsale in Rome. Eating over priced salads with Beckinsale is perhaps the height of of Barbie's career. It's "proof" that Barbie's account of student-drug-crazed threesomes is correct - even though the latest court-theory is that sex had nothing to do with this tragedy.

Nadeau sold the film rights to her book "Student Killer" to Winterbottom. Heck, they even cast someone to play Frank Sfarzo. The plot could not be any more bizarre, really, it is about a California filmmaker fleeing to Italy as his career crashes, and he gets involved with the "journalists" covering the case.

So the film really isn't about the "Student Killer", except that Nadeau has profited handsomely from Meredith's death. The one nod to Nadeau's theories is that the film (at least in the teaser) heavily hints there was such a thing as "sex on a train".

For the 100th time, there was no sex-on-a-train!!!!!
 
Last edited:
????? What are you talking about?


Just because he has stolen items does not mean he can sell them. Keep in mind that Rudy said he broke into the nursery because he didn't have the 30 Euros to stay at a hostel...not that 30 Euros would be required.

From my perspective, not my cop friend, Rudy's stories are absurd and self serving. Hey, even ugly guys get laid, hell, even I have gotten lucky a few times, so while it is possible that Rudy had a date with Meredith...although very far fetched and not confirmed by anyone.

It is also possible that while he was on a date with this new girl, 30 minutes after his arrival, he excused himself to take a dump in the bathroom farthest away from Meredith's room, fell asleep on the toilet and then someone knocked on the door and Meredith let that person in and the stranger killed Meredith and Rudy came out and fought with him and the guy left.

Just as it is possible that Rudy bought a laptop that was stolen about 3 blocks from his home two weeks earlier in a city 282 miles away. Want to buy some swamp land? More likely is that Rudy wanted to sell the laptop while he was in Milan. And the fact that Rudy had computers in his apartment at home means that he is far more likely to be a seller ..NOT a buyer.

There doesn't seem to be any doubt that Rudi did have someone let him in and I think paid him.
????? What are you talking about?

It must be the lawyer's office and the window was a staging he means, have I got that right? I think it infinitely more likely he broke in and the alarm evidence is wrong.
 
From IMDB - The Face of an Angel

Both a journalist and a documentary filmmaker chase the story of a murder and its prime suspect.

Director: Michael Winterbottom
Writers: Barbie Latza Nadeau (based on the book by), Paul Viragh (screenplay)

If I am not mistaken, this guy plays Frank Sfarzo!

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0969364/
 
So the film really isn't about the "Student Killer", except that Nadeau has profited handsomely from Meredith's death. The one nod to Nadeau's theories is that the film (at least in the teaser) heavily hints there was such a thing as "sex on a train".

For the 100th time, there was no sex-on-a-train!!!!!

If there was "sex on a train," why would it matter? Sounds like a safe kind of kinky to be honest.
 
Hey AC,
Someone, per Rudy,
Rang The Doorbell!

They did not knock...

Why the heck would Amanda ring the doorbell to her own residence?
And why the heck would Meredith open her doorway late on a night she was all alone,
with the music earphones that CodyJuneau pointed out, still in her ears?

Keep in mind that there was a person spotted outside in the garden in the week before Miss Kercher's brutal death.
Once by her, and another time by someone else too.

If Meredith was the least bit worried that night,
surely she would have closed and locked the front door security bars, right?
What am I talkin' about? Watch the crime scene video:
https://mega.co.nz/#!O4Zh3QxY!MLLxQsnTnxYs-zyAwlsjoak4-yw9QIPILsefu8ZDq08

My mistake..going by memory. I thought Rudy said someone "rang"..but didn't check. "ringing" the doorbell seemed more like embellishment than knocking..but I knew it was one o the other. Thanks for correcting me.

It's not that Rudi's stories aren't possible. As is anything is possible that isn't proven "not to be possible". But my BS meter pegs the end of the gauge when I hear or read them. Most "first dates" don't happen at a girl's apartment. Most girls protect themselves a little better than that. They want to know the guy before they bring them to their home alone. That sounds more like a hook up to me. But even this is possible...but not very probable. Then if I'm with a new girl, I'm not likely to drop a big stinky deuce at her apartment. And if I did, I'm not likely to "fall asleep" on the toilet. What is he? A narcoleptic?

And when does someone stop by just to kill the girl that is there and leaves?

No, everything about this story sounds like bull to me. Sure it all might be possible. But is it something I'd reasonably consider to be true? NOT HARDLY.
 
????? What are you talking about?

Rudi paid someone in Milan that let him in the nursery - he didn't break-in.


Just because he has stolen items does not mean he can sell them. Keep in mind that Rudy said he broke into the nursery because he didn't have the 30 Euros to stay at a hostel...not that 30 Euros would be required.

How much did it cost him to be given entry to the nursery?

From my perspective, not my cop friend, Rudy's stories are absurd and self serving. Hey, even ugly guys get laid, hell, even I have gotten lucky a few times, so while it is possible that Rudy had a date with Meredith...although very far fetched and not confirmed by anyone.

I think you expressed a different attitude when this was discussed before. The police didn't think the sex was forced and believed she had made a date. The early reports had the pen knife right so maybe the other early reports were also accurate.

It is also possible that while he was on a date with this new girl, 30 minutes after his arrival, he excused himself to take a dump in the bathroom farthest away from Meredith's room, fell asleep on the toilet and then someone knocked on the door and Meredith let that person in and the stranger killed Meredith and Rudy came out and fought with him and the guy left.

Fell asleep. I think you once again confused. Of because of digestion (GE) we know that it was no more than 5 minutes :rolleyes:

Just as it is possible that Rudy bought a laptop that was stolen about 3 blocks from his home two weeks earlier in a city 282 miles away. Want to buy some swamp land? More likely is that Rudy wanted to sell the laptop while he was in Milan. And the fact that Rudy had computers in his apartment at home means that he is far more likely to be a seller ..NOT a buyer.

I thought he could sell them, isn't that your theory. Are you suggesting that fences have no inventory? Fences are acquirers and sellers.

Tesla RW has brought us new information If he had many stolen items it points to him being a fence as thieves get rid of stuff quickly to...drum-roll...fences. Others like to believe as much of Rudi's stories as possible and I don't think it is a stretch to believe he did fence stuff. This makes him going to the lawyers' office make far more sense.

Want to buy a TBM?
 
There doesn't seem to be any doubt that Rudi did have someone let him in and I think paid him.
????? What are you talking about?

It must be the lawyer's office and the window was a staging he means, have I got that right? I think it infinitely more likely he broke in and the alarm evidence is wrong.

I was talking about the nursery in Milan.

All we know about the lawyers' office is that Rudi had the stolen stuff with him and that he went to the lawyers and told them that he hadn't stolen from them. He just might have been telling the truth.
 
If there was "sex on a train," why would it matter? Sounds like a safe kind of kinky to be honest.

It doesn't matter, but it did not happen. Whether it matters or not, it did not happen.

This was one of the earliest proofs presented to me that Amanda Knox was a killer. I thought like you, "What does it matter?" But it was presented to me as if it were ME doing something wrong - "How does it feel to be supporting a little slut who'd had sex on a train?"

Little slut or not, what does this have to do with anything? It was so bizarre I went a little nuts, I admit. I researched the claim into the ground.... turns out it never happened.

Barbie Nadeau's "Student Killer" book has as a sub-thesis that Perugia was a sex-crazed college town with drugs and threesomes just waiting for a psychopathological being to show up to explode. Her thesis was that the psychopathic killer in Knox lay dormant until the deadly environs of Perugia was encountered.

Me, I get criticized for saying that even Judge Massei didn't see any psychopathology in Knox or Sollecito. Now Judge Nencini comes along and tells us, despite the ISC's directive, that this wasn't about sex at all....

Nencini had a witness he could trust on that point - Rudy Guede.

So much of this case early on was the sluttification of Foxy Knoxy, who in reality was a pre-teen soccer player, that the allegation of "sex-on-a-train" just cannot pass without comment.

And Winterbottom's teaser has it in it. Without the femme fatale, people just might figure out that Rugy Guede is a liar, and a lying liar, and that Nencini is fomenting an injustice.....

.... and Winterbottom gets to profit by making a film. So does Nadeau, who has monetized this tragedy in a way An-DREA-ah has yet to do.... but Andrea Vogt is shilling for Mignini these days.
 
Last edited:
I am but mad north-northwest: when the wind is southerly I know a hawk from a handsaw

If there was "sex on a train," why would it matter? Sounds like a safe kind of kinky to be honest.
I am recalling the final scenes of the film "North by Northwest." In any case I agree with Bill Williams: it would not matter if it did happen, but I strongly doubt that it did.
 
Last edited:
Cristian is a little more sketchy. By the way it is spelled Cristian Tramontano. Rudi's name only came up after his pictures were in the paper.

The only "proof" of Rudi breaking into the law offices is that he had their stuff. Fences always have stolen stuff and no they don't always buy the stuff, sometimes, like drugs, it is fronted to them. It could be the case that Rudi owed the man money and they went with him to get it at the cottage.

What was Koko or Cocoa doing there?

Maybe it was Coko or Koco.
 
Have you folks ever lived or worked near the beach and had an unoccupied car block your driveway?
ERRRR!!!

The main reason to keep this in mind is that Rudi, err Rudy might have had an accomplice due to the FACT that the tow truck driver saw an old dark car parked at the top of the driveway to Miss Kercher's flat that night.

There are no, I'll repeat, no reports of anyone entering, starting up and driving this dark car,
(which FS reports had old license plates too on it),
away while the tow truck driver worked on the broken down car.

A much overlooked clue, in my old surfer opinion!

So that must mean the old dark colored car was still parked at the entrance to Meredith Kercher's flat
when the tow truck driver left,
right?

Raffaele ain't drivin' no old beat up car, his society status dictates that!
So whose car was it, what was it doing there?

The driver parked it there so they didn't have to pay a parkin' fee as the went shoppin' l8 on on holiday night.
Nope! To late at night...

The parker of the car was bangin' some gal or guy who lived near Nara and didn't wanna pay the parkin' fee as he did so, so he took a chance that Filomena, Laura, Meredith or Amanda was not gonna tow away his car as he got it on?
Maybe that was the LOUD scream Nara heard, some chick havin'n an incredible O.
Nope.

Why was the dark colored car, which had old license plates,
(like Kokomani's car did, from what I recall)
still there at the top of Meredith's driveway when the tow truck,
and the family whose broken down auto was repaired, then split the scene?

Any other suggestions?
RW

RW, you always write great, provocative posts which I enjoy reading. The main problem I have with this particular theory of yours is that it unnecessarily complicates what otherwise is a very straightforward scenario: by piecing together Guede's MO, the evidence left at the scene, and the tragic fate of Meredith Kercher, the most straightforward conclusion is that Meredith Kercher walked in on Guede's burglary in progress, and he murdered and then sexually violated her.

I guess my main question to you regarding your Kokomani theory is the following: where does it get you that the simpler explanation fails to do? Based on what we know about Guede's history, we do not know him to have worked with a partner. For example, surely Kokomani was not lingering in the shadows somewhere up at the nursery in Milan.

I'm genuinely curious about your hunch on this one; because, although I don't follow you down this particular path, most of the time I think you have very sharp and incisive takes. Do you feel that Kokomani's involvement would explain the scenario's escalating into Meredith's brutal death, for example? But, then, how do you account for his nonexistent profile in the murder room?
 
RW, you always write great, provocative posts which I enjoy reading. The main problem I have with this particular theory of yours is that it unnecessarily complicates what otherwise is a very straightforward scenario: by piecing together Guede's MO, the evidence left at the scene, and the tragic fate of Meredith Kercher, the most straightforward conclusion is that Meredith Kercher walked in on Guede's burglary in progress, and he murdered and then sexually violated her.

Occam lived in a simpler time when up was up, down was down and the earth was flat. William of Ockham (c. 1287 – 1347). RW has complicated the picture by bringing the Spanish people into this and making Rudi look like more than a second story man but rather a fence.

I guess my main question to you regarding your Kokomani theory is the following: where does it get you that the simpler explanation fails to do? Based on what we know about Guede's history, we do not know him to have worked with a partner. For example, surely Kokomani was not lingering in the shadows somewhere up at the nursery in Milan.

We really have little of Rudi's history. No Koko wasn't in the shadows in Milan and it doesn't appear he broke in there, rather was let in.

I'm genuinely curious about your hunch on this one; because, although I don't follow you down this particular path, most of the time I think you have very sharp and incisive takes. Do you feel that Kokomani's involvement would explain the scenario's escalating into Meredith's brutal death, for example? But, then, how do you account for his nonexistent profile in the murder room?

If Rudi was with a more experienced Albanian crook perhaps that crook took extra precautions and I believe it was the case that unidentified DNA and prints were found in the cottage for example the Y Haplotypes found on the bra clasp.

By apologies to RW for replying.
 
Rudi paid someone in Milan that let him in the nursery - he didn't break-in.

How much did it cost him to be given entry to the nursery?
So you think this was as an inside job?? Are you making this up? And why would Rudy pay someone to get into the nursery instead of paying to sleep at a hostel? How far out on a limb do you plan on going with this?

I think you expressed a different attitude when this was discussed before.
You're right, I did. I think Rudy is ugly and that pretty of a girl is not likely to have anything to do with the bum. That said...it is possible....but not very likely. Especially when you take into account that he doesn't have a phone, a job, not a student, hardly can communicate with. yea sure, it's possible. :rolleyes:
The police didn't think the sex was forced and believed she had made a date. The early reports had the pen knife right so maybe the other early reports were also accurate.
The police also thought that Amanda and Raffaele killed Meredith. The police also insist their were multiple assailants. The police also thought the shoes belonged to Raffaele. You will excuse me if I don't have a lot of faith in the Peurgian police force.:rolleyes:


I thought he could sell them, isn't that your theory. Are you suggesting that fences have no inventory? Fences are acquirers and sellers. ????
They also have money. They also have phones, they also have ways to reach them. A lot of burglars "fence" their own goods. So he could be both.

The fact that you keep dancing around is that Rudy was CAUGHT inside the Nursery. That he was CAUGHT with a laptop STOLEN from 3 blocks from his home that he SAYS was bought in Milan 282 miles from there. This is BS story Grinder. Wouldn't your BS flashing light go off on this story?

Tesla RW has brought us new information If he had many stolen items it points to him being a fence as thieves get rid of stuff quickly to...drum-roll...fences. Others like to believe as much of Rudi's stories as possible and I don't think it is a stretch to believe he did fence stuff. This makes him going to the lawyers' office make far more sense.
Again, this is the guy that everyone says doesn't have a phone, the most basic of communication devices. I'm sure as a burglar, he sold stolen items, probably much of what he stole. Does that make him a fence? I don't think so. A fence is someone who buys stolen goods as a profession. Think of a pawn shop as opposed to an unemployed gardener.

Want to buy a TBM?

No, but I'll sell you one. All you have to do is dig it up. I'll even tell you where it is. And given these stories that you are buying from Rudi, you would be writing the check.
 
Last edited:
If I recall correctly, the car parked in the cottage driveway while the tow truck was there belonged to friends of the couple with the broken down car.
 
Loose Ends...

Are there any cases where a convicted murderer and rapist is allowed to continue roaming the streets after a conviction? I have a feeling that this is all show and they are looking for a way to shut this off that makes the prosecution still look good.

My understanding is the conviction isn't final until it has been confirmed at the final level, the Italian Supreme Court of Cassation. But the fact that he is not being held in custody, only having his passport taken away, as others have noted in legal blogs, is a marked change from how he was originally treated. and may be an indication that the case is indeed headed for dismissal.

From AbcyTesla, answering Grinder;

It is also possible that while he was on a date with this new girl, 30 minutes after his arrival, he excused himself to take a dump in the bathroom farthest away from Meredith's room, fell asleep on the toilet and then someone knocked on the door and Meredith let that person in and the stranger killed Meredith and Rudy came out and fought with him and the guy left.

I don't buy that Meredith was dating Rudy. She was dating the guy downstairs and was bummed out that she couldn't trust him not to cheat on her. She was adamant in that position about "loyalty & trust" with both Amanda and Lauren, when Amanda had asked her advice on dating Raf at a kitchen table conversation, while she was not quite broken up with her boyfriend from Seattle. This, in combination with Rudy's reputation as a frequent persistent creepy harasser of women, does not suggest he is telling the truth about having scored a date with the bright, pretty, talented Erasmus Scholar. She isn't likely to cheat, and certainly not with unemployed certifiably creepy drifter Rudy. Rather, it sounds like the lie Rudy tells himself that his seduction technique is irresistible, and its not his fault Meredith got hurt.

I am recalling the final scenes of the film "North by Northwest." In any case I agree with Bill Williams: it would not matter if it did happen, but I strongly doubt that it did.

Amanda's book WTBH explains the incident in full, there was no sex on a train. She met the guy, and they (Amanda, Sister, and guy) all got off on the same train stop. Amanda wrote went to his room and fooled around, but she got cold feet and left - no sex with him. I see no reason to doubt.

From JS202

RW, you always write great, provocative posts which I enjoy reading. The main problem I have with this particular theory of yours is that it unnecessarily complicates what otherwise is a very straightforward scenario: by piecing together Guede's MO, the evidence left at the scene, and the tragic fate of Meredith Kercher, the most straightforward conclusion is that Meredith Kercher walked in on Guede's burglary in progress, and he murdered and then sexually violated her.

I guess my main question to you regarding your Kokomani theory is the following: where does it get you that the simpler explanation fails to do? Based on what we know about Guede's history, we do not know him to have worked with a partner. For example, surely Kokomani was not lingering in the shadows somewhere up at the nursery in Milan.

With respect to Koko, wasn't the cottage next to the basketball court and drug park? Couldn't Koko have been there on some separate drug business, as previous tenants had complained of various druggies hanging out and leaving paraphernalia around their driveway in the past? Main point though is Guede's MO, as JS202 points out. There's no indication Guede ever worked with anyone else, just goes in and makes himself at home, and makes a mess of other people's things. Steals what he can. Likes cash and electronics, i.e. computers and cell phones like he took from the lawyers office in Perugia (I take this back, KESTREL pointed out that the car was a friend of the couple who had car trouble. No need to explain it as far as I can tell - CJ72).

From Grinder:

Originally Posted by Grinder
Tesla RW has brought us new information If he had many stolen items it points to him being a fence as thieves get rid of stuff quickly to...drum-roll...fences. Others like to believe as much of Rudi's stories as possible and I don't think it is a stretch to believe he did fence stuff. This makes him going to the lawyers' office make far more sense.
-----

Just pure speculation to make the logical leap from, having a few computers in his room, to becoming a financially successful "fence". What we do know is that Rudy was getting evicted, and skipped out on his rent when he fled to Germany after the crime. Also, he stole 2,000 euros from the Nursery, no? Not much of a houseguest. Though the owner speculated an employee may have let him in, still a B&E though.

(its unreasonable to suggest Rudy didn't steal from the law office, and the break-in style was a rock through window, second floor climb up, with a metal grating directly under the window of entry - a dead match for the break-in at the cottage. Pulled a knife on CT, had a filched 11 inch knife from the nursery when caught, had knife fighting scars on his body, and knife cuts on his hand in Germany consistent with a killing by knife).

Rudy owns this crime, all by himself, and there's nothing anywhere to suggest otherwise. IMO -

TO SUM IT UP FOR ME AT THIS POINT:

I'm for the simplest version, expressed so many times before by so many; Meredith came home and interrupted Rudy's burglary, and accidentally locks herself inside with him, because the malfunctioning door only opens and locks with a key. Rudy surprises her from behind or not, but either way tries to rape her, she fights, then he panics & kills her. The only thing I go further on, is Rudy goes downstairs to the guys' flat, uses the keys he got from Meredith who had them to water the pot plants of her boyfriend. Rudy gets a change of clothes so he can get home without looking like he came from a butcher's shop. Then goes dancing to create a fake alibi. (Still trying to find the translated testimony from the guys downstairs, I'm pretty sure the defense pursued this line of questioning as I think I remember seeing it somewhere). That's all I got.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom