Diocletus
Illuminator
- Joined
- May 19, 2011
- Messages
- 3,969
Rudy Wasn't Identified Via Palmprint or Fingerprint
The palmprint comparison only confirmed an identification that had already been made. They didn't have the ability to do a computerized match. Also, note how they knew to look for a "third" guy: because the initial round of forensics told them that Sollecito and Lumumba didn't do it.
Alberto Intini:
The palmprint comparison only confirmed an identification that had already been made. They didn't have the ability to do a computerized match. Also, note how they knew to look for a "third" guy: because the initial round of forensics told them that Sollecito and Lumumba didn't do it.
Alberto Intini:
QUESTION - How was the Guede you know?
ANSWER - I can tell you the scientific part, that no investigation.
QUESTION - Of course.
ANSWER - I remember the first analysis of various biological samples was found a male DNA profile that did not correspond to the period investigated, two of which were male. In particular, a genetic profile was extracted from the full repertata detected and toilet paper in the toilet of one of two bathrooms, and even if I am wrong on the vaginal swab done to the victim. It seems to me only on these two, I would not be wrong, however, revealed a profile of a man, as biologists use to write in the report, 1 man, that did not correspond to the two. So we took cognizance that the crime scene, with a role that he would be assessed and of course there was definitely a different man from the two, as the third, as the second did not interest us and then there was the need to understand the investigative plan to which we told who it was. Simultaneously there was an activity of other operators, the fingerprint, which Boemio which is always mentioned with regard to a palmprint in blood on the pillow where he was the victim rested, good enough to be on a pillow that is obviously not as good a support surface of a solid, smooth, a palmprint that was identified by her fingerprints to the card then found the suspect Rudy Guede.
QUESTION - This print was evident palmprint?
ANSWER - Evident in what sense? On a technical level and it was obvious enough to make a fingerprint comparison, as the engineers say, have identified more than enough points on the case law to consider the identity of this palmprint of blood on the pillow and the palmprint on the tag of Rudy Guede. Rather, I want to be more precise, we say the comparison is made on suspicion, not that we have identified the palmprint from the impression. Among the various suspects, I cannot remember in what capacity, the mobile also indicated Rudy Guede, taking his card there was a confrontation between the palmprint ink on the tag fotodattiloscopico Rudy Guede and the imprint of blood and identity was given on the right points, at least, certainly more than 15.
QUESTION - But it could be done through the AFIS?
ANSWER - It is an interesting question because the AFIS is the fingerprint, we also have the APIS is the palmprint and then of AFIS we have an automated response only on digital. On the palmprint there is another part that is more recent, three or four years, there is only one million palmprints on the cards that we have the dates but we only have one million base compared to nine million digital so it's a database that is under development, deployment, but not yet complete. So do not give us response efficacy and self as it gives the AFIS for digital, then automatically we could not have an answer for the identification of the palmprint. We arrived for a comparison, I suspect, as we did with the other, on a subject then was the right one identity reported by the Flying Squad.
QUESTION - At the moment, thanks
Last edited: