I've been wanting to make this thread but am doing so now because of a direct request from Mercutio. I appreciate his rational, civil, logical, and fair approach to debate. Others here would do well to follow his lead.
In response to The PentaCon....a common thing for skeptics to say is:
"But physical evidence trumps eyewitness testimony."
Well the anomalous physical evidence is what started all the questions to begin with. That's what inspired us to go to Arlington and find out what people saw in the first place.
So as in most investigations....this one was inspired by suspicions that arose from examining physical evidence.
The eyewitness testimony simply confirmed our suspicions beyond our wildest imaginations.
Realize that if the citgo witnesses are even somewhat correct in their placement of the plane that this PROVES the physical damage was staged which means the physical evidence IS the crime. Therefore the approach of this investigation has to adjust accordingly. We must look for anomalies.
Here is a nice breakdown in regards to the anomalous physical evidence:
Where is the tail section damage to the third floor? Why is column 14AA still intact?
Why are columns 15-20 blown *up and out*, or not damaged at all from the right wing?
Why is there no continuity to the "wing damage" when it tilted up it's right wing?. It looks as if the facade simply fell off in part of this section. Clearly no wing passed through it.
Why is the floor undamaged, if a 757 just tilted it's left wing, dropped down on the ground, and skidded under the first floor?
If the left wing/engine allegedly tilted and went through/under the first floor. Why is the foundation, the shoring is resting upon, still intact????
Here is the RB211 for scale reference...
This animation from Purdue University didn't even bother including the engines since clearly there was no physical explanation for their existence:
And this image from the ASCE report shows how the plane was allegedly tilted and even depicts the left engine digging into the foundation!
So how could the foundation possibly remain undamaged???
Now everyone is well aware that there is zero evidence that any large pieces of aircraft were found at all and that the only physical evidence of an aircraft that was released is limited to these few parts:
Other than a few more much smaller scattered remnants this is the extent of it. Nothing else even somewhat substantial was reported.
Although the area that allegedly got hit had just undergone a renovation and had blast proof windows etc.............it wasn't built to be 757 proof.
Here is the thickness and material that made up the Pentagon wall:
There is no reason an entire 100 ton 757 would completely disintegrate while leaving areas within the alleged impact of these walls virtually untouched.
So there you go.
Physical evidence that a 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon.
The eyewitness testimony simply corroborates the obvious anomalies in the physical evidence.
The plane did not hit the Pentagon.
In response to The PentaCon....a common thing for skeptics to say is:
"But physical evidence trumps eyewitness testimony."
Well the anomalous physical evidence is what started all the questions to begin with. That's what inspired us to go to Arlington and find out what people saw in the first place.
So as in most investigations....this one was inspired by suspicions that arose from examining physical evidence.
The eyewitness testimony simply confirmed our suspicions beyond our wildest imaginations.
Realize that if the citgo witnesses are even somewhat correct in their placement of the plane that this PROVES the physical damage was staged which means the physical evidence IS the crime. Therefore the approach of this investigation has to adjust accordingly. We must look for anomalies.
Here is a nice breakdown in regards to the anomalous physical evidence:
Where is the tail section damage to the third floor? Why is column 14AA still intact?
Why are columns 15-20 blown *up and out*, or not damaged at all from the right wing?
Why is there no continuity to the "wing damage" when it tilted up it's right wing?. It looks as if the facade simply fell off in part of this section. Clearly no wing passed through it.
Why is the floor undamaged, if a 757 just tilted it's left wing, dropped down on the ground, and skidded under the first floor?
If the left wing/engine allegedly tilted and went through/under the first floor. Why is the foundation, the shoring is resting upon, still intact????
Here is the RB211 for scale reference...
This animation from Purdue University didn't even bother including the engines since clearly there was no physical explanation for their existence:
And this image from the ASCE report shows how the plane was allegedly tilted and even depicts the left engine digging into the foundation!
So how could the foundation possibly remain undamaged???
Now everyone is well aware that there is zero evidence that any large pieces of aircraft were found at all and that the only physical evidence of an aircraft that was released is limited to these few parts:
Other than a few more much smaller scattered remnants this is the extent of it. Nothing else even somewhat substantial was reported.
Although the area that allegedly got hit had just undergone a renovation and had blast proof windows etc.............it wasn't built to be 757 proof.
Here is the thickness and material that made up the Pentagon wall:
There is no reason an entire 100 ton 757 would completely disintegrate while leaving areas within the alleged impact of these walls virtually untouched.
So there you go.
Physical evidence that a 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon.
The eyewitness testimony simply corroborates the obvious anomalies in the physical evidence.
The plane did not hit the Pentagon.
