• I've created a thread for feedback on the reaction/likes feature Feedback thread
  • You may find search is unavailable for a little while. Trying to fix a problem.

[Merged] Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark?

Status
Not open for further replies.
"This is a lie because millions and maybe billions of high school students know about the expansion of space."

Well, lets tell me something about expanding space.

With you own words.

Anything att all.

What happening for expanding space, when expanding space metric goordinating grow?

Tell me, please.

Love
1038
:)
 
Dense star out of the expanding light up protruding past the star to get help
protrude and then away from the star to protrude from old
Photons and saw a star out onto the protruding Star has its own expanding light
the so-called. Gravitation redshift.

If and when photons are expanding and expanding the movement to recycle /
energy, we do not need such concepts as space and expanding
domed space to explain any phenomenon.

Ps. Three-dimensional expansion of an expanding based on a condensation
crystallizations of its own internal circulation / pressure, as well as the fact that the
through them pushed all the background movement which can be get in decomposition just like a bowling ball pins must be pushed out onto the asunder. And what's more expansive through a condensation of all the background
very fast movement is pushed, the slower its rate changes,
When it was finally absorbed into a new expansive crystallizations internal movement!

There is no reason to think say that the so-called. Entropy also affect all particles, such as quarks and photons internally!

tractive power / curved space are not existing things.

Entropy is a present and it also affects the particle internally!

Moving on, there is!

Love
1038
:)
 
Last edited:
Expanding condensations vs. expanding space

Those who believe in the Big Bang theory, believe in the existence of a an expanding
space! But no one is capable of explaining of what is making the expanding space
expand, or how it does it! No one can tell what happens to the expanding space when
it expands!

I have asked and I have received these kinds of answers!

Question: What happens to the expanding space when it expands?

Answer: The metric coordinate system of the space is growing.

Question: Where is based on?

Answer: It is based on the expanding of the space.

As you can see, there doesn´t exist a well founded answer to this, not yet anyway!
No one can tell what kind of system the expanding space in itself is!

The Onesimpleprinciple- model is able to explain how the condensations of the
visible universe are expanding all the time three-dimensionally outwards to already
existing space, which is an eternal and infinite space of nothing!

Every system/condensation contains movement which is always pushing force! The inner
motion/pressure is based on recycling. That means that the expanding system consists
of smaller expanding systems which are recycling expanding motion/energy among each
other.

With this inner motion/pushing force the expanding system/condensation is able to
slow down the speed of the energy of the pushing motion/energy expanding from the
outside, making some of the pushing motion from outside to its own inner motion.
This newfound inner motion/pushing force can be used to do the same again and all
the while gain increasing motion/energy which, as an inner motion, is object´s inner
pushing force/pressure which makes the condensation expand/scatter to bigger and
bigger area to an eternal and infinite space of nothing!

Love
1038
:)
 
The condensation itself consists of smaller condensations that recycle the eternal motion in a corresponding way and therefore the inner motion/pressure gets the thing in the system to scatter to wider and wider band with help from pushing force.

The bigger band the expanding motion of the subject scatters to, the more motion of all background protrudes through it and the more it gets that motion to its own inner motion/energy/pushing force.

So the condensations that form all the backgrounds motion no longer expand in the same ratio as the expanding motions that form the visible universe do and that is exactly why they keep pushing more and more through the expanding condensations of the visible universe all the time.

The further forward the visible universe protrudes, the less motion/energy (not dark energy) of all background have the expanding condensations ahead been able to eat/absorb to themselves. That is also why there is more and more motion/energy of all background available for the expanding condensations of the visible world all the time.

In this way the Onesimpleprinciple model is able to explain how and why the expanding condensations expand outward to the already existing space. And since a portion of the inner expanding motion/energy is directed out of the expanding condensation, functions that expanding motion/energy as a pushing force by the aid of which the expanding condensation is able to push other similar expanding condensations/concentrations away from itself.

Love
1038
:)
 
So Onesimpleprinciple model is capable of kyykyttämään the Big Bang theory
supporters of coming and going, because Onesimpleprinciple model explains what makes
expanding a condensation to expand and the expanding crystallizations
occurs when they expand!

These are simple questions, but these questions are not
expanding space believers unable to pay because they are not able to
to tell anything about what happens to themselves expanding to space
when it expands! They did not tell us anything about what makes expanding
space to expand at an accelerating pace, and not on how it was
makes!

What is dark energy that makes most expansive space to expand
at an accelerating pace, and how it interacts with the expanding space
with? Anyone who is considering this issue with the idea that you'll soon
expanding the space is equivalent concept than what the gods are!


Questions on which the initial explosion sect members are unable to meet.

1. What kind of systemically expanding the space itself?

2. What happens expanding itself for space when it expands?

3. What is to maintain the expansion of the expanding space?

4. What is dark energy?

5. What is dark energy come from?

6. How does the dark energy interacts with the expanding space?

7. Where expanding the space itself is composed of?

8. The supporters of the Big Bang theory of the expanding space does not expand
out onto an existing space, so it would be really nice
to know where and how it expands, but they are not able to tähänhän
match!

9. If at first there was nothing, not even a space, then how
expanding the space on earth it came from total non-existence and
So how is it then expands to a comfortable, if not out of the already existing
state?


I would argue that expanding the space is a man out of his hat tempaisema concept which
does not exist!

I would argue that the space is eternal and infinite space which is nothing at all, and
therefore, it can not change in any way!

All now existing movement has always been there!

Movement = energy

Movement = pushing force

Matter / energy = pushing force

You are pushing force.

The perpetual motion itself is capable of maintaining the eternal recycling because it is
also pushing force, or the eternal recycling does not need other forces.

And therefore also known. tractive power and space are curved human out of his hat tempaisemia concepts that do not exist!

Capture the Move

Love
1038
:)
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Pixie of key said:
Expanding condensations vs. expanding space
Click to expand...
Usual lies and gibberish from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos

The lies:
  • Teachers explain the Big Bang to millions of high school science students!
  • Lying about the explanation he has received in this thread.
    The theory states the universe can be expanding, contracting or static.
    The physical evidence is that the universe is expanding.
 
Pixie of key said:
So Onesimpleprinciple model is capable of kyykyttämään the Big Bang theory
Click to expand...
So a lie from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos

Someone who remains totally ignorant about the Big Bang after 8 years cannot use their fantasies to explain what they do not know :jaw-dropp!

  • Delusion or an insanely bad translation of "crystallizations".
  • A lie about "not able to to tell anything about what happens to themselves expanding to space". Three are things called science textbooks which science students read :eek:!
  • A lie of "They did not tell us anything about what makes expanding space to expand at an accelerating pace".
  • A science is religion delusion with "than what the gods are"?
  • The idiocy that The Big Bang is to do with dark energy. There is the "initial explosion" and then expansion.
  • Insulting the majority of scientists with "initial explosion sect members"
  • What looks like an ignorant delusion that space is made of something: "Where expanding the space itself is composed of"
  • The lie from ignorance about expanding space not being explained yet again.
    Expanding space expands everywhere. Every point in space gets further away from every other point.
    How expanding space expands is that the density of matter causes the expansion. If we solve the equations of GR for a homogeneous, isotropic expanding or contracting universe then we find that whether it expands or contracts depending on the density of matter.
  • The ignorance that the Big Bang includes the origin of the universe.
    GR breaks down at T = 0 so the Big Bang starts at T > 0.
 
Last edited:
"The lie from ignorance about expanding space not being explained yet again.
Expanding space expands everywhere. Every point in space gets further away from every other point.
How expanding space expands is that the density of matter causes the expansion. If we solve the equations of GR for a homogeneous, isotropic expanding or contracting universe then we find that whether it expands or contracts depending on the density of matter.
The ignorance that the Big Bang includes the origin of the universe.
GR breaks down at T = 0 so the Big Bang starts at T > 0."


Handwaving with out real explanation.

It same if i say, reason for flash is Zeus.

It is Zeus, because it is Zeus.

Space expanding because space expanding.

Galaxy clusters grow more distant one from another, without moving away from both asunder, because the expanding space expands somehow somehow themselves.

That is, expanding the space does not expand outwards. It expands somehow to itself somehow.

No one will tell me how.

Creator God created universe somehow somehow.

Of course it is.

After all, we see the universe. It proves the existence of a creator god.

expanding the space has been generally light red shift.

Of course it is.

After all, we can see the old light to be generally redshifted.

No way!!!

We have found that light expands.

We cant detect the space itself in any way. Space does not radiate info.

There is no expansive space which could be studied scientifically.

There is no creator god which could be studied scientifically.

There are expansive light that can be studied scientifically.

Expanding material that can be studied scientifically.

love
1038
:)
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Pixie of key: The repeated lie of "No one will tell me how"

Pixie of key said:
No one will tell me how.
Click to expand...
The repeated lie of "No one will tell me how" from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.

How space expands has been explained to you many times in this thread.
How space expends is explained in textbooks, Wikipedia and in many places on the Internet, e.g see Frequently Asked Questions in Cosmology.
 
Pixie of key: More religious ranting and then red shift ignorance

Pixie of key said:
...expanding the space has been generally light red shift.
Click to expand...
More religious ranting and then red shift ignorance from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.

Just measuring redshift tells us nothing except that a galaxy has a velocity.
The measurement that galaxy redshifts increase with their distance is support for an expanding universe.
 
Pixie of key: A lie of "no expansive space which could be studied scientifically"

Pixie of key said:
No way!!!

We have found that light expands.
Click to expand...
Yes way :jaw-dropp!!!

If the universe expands then any non-bound system in it expands, e.g. the light that travels to us from distant galaxies. Thus the wavelength of light "expands" - this is called redshift :eek:!

Pixie of key said:
We cant detect the space itself in any way. Space does not radiate info.
Click to expand...
No one is claiming to "detect the space itself in any way".

Pixie of key said:
There is no expansive space which could be studied scientifically.
Click to expand...
A lie of "no expansive space which could be studied scientifically" from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.

Cosmology is a science that has been studying space scientifically for about a century and finding an expansive space which is still being studied scientifically.
 
Last edited:
Close galactic encounter leaves 'nearly naked' supermassive black hole

http://m.phys.org/news/2016-11-galactic-encounter-naked-supermassive-black.html


""We were looking for orbiting pairs of supermassive black holes, with one offset from the center of a galaxy, as telltale evidence of a previous galaxy merger," said James Condon, of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory. "Instead, we found this black hole fleeing from the larger galaxy and leaving a trail of debris behind it," he added.

"We've not seen anything like this before," Condon said."

"Tuxford - 51 minutes ago

i predicted such a condition from as early as my first post in 2010, while the Huge Bang Fantasy was still indisputable, and merger maniacs still ruled uncontested:

http://m.phys.org/news/2010-11-spitzer-shrouded-stars.html

And again shortly thereafter in 2012:

http://m.phys.org/news/2012-02-star-factory-arp.html

And recent news supports my predictions. Just say'in. (See my links hereunder:)

http://m.phys.org/news/2016-10-vlt-unexpected-giant-halos-distant.html



Tuxford - 17 minutes ago

And here is another embarrassing naked hole, albeit a bit smaller.

http://m.phys.org/news/2016-01-rare-galaxy-black-holes-starved.html#nRlv

The bashful hole in this story has grown so large and disruptively active that it has blown away the naturally outwardly migrating stars, with the surrounding region only filled with new gas ejected therefrom that is so turbulent that new stars can no longer form.

http://m.phys.org/news/2010-11-milky-stars-mysterious-ways.html

Or maybe you prefer the contorted explanations of the merger maniacs?? Bendy?

..............

Rakkautta
1038
:)




Tuxford - 17 minutes ago

And here is another embarrassing naked hole, albeit a bit smaller.

http://m.phys.org/news/2016-01-rare-galaxy-black-holes-starved.html#nRlv

The bashful hole in this story has grown so large and disruptively active that it has blown away the naturally outwardly migrating stars, with the surrounding region only filled with new gas ejected therefrom that is so turbulent that new stars can no longer form.

http://m.phys.org/news/2010-11-milky-stars-mysterious-ways.html

Or maybe you prefer the contorted explanations of the merger maniacs?? Bendy?"

..............

Love
1038
:)
 
Last edited:
Pixie of key: Ignorantly quotes a deluded person commentng on a blog article

Pixie of key said:
Close galactic encounter leaves 'nearly naked' supermassive black hole

http://m.phys.org/news/2016-11-galactic-encounter-naked-supermassive-black.html


""We were looking for orbiting pairs of supermassive black holes, with one offset from the center of a galaxy, as telltale evidence of a previous galaxy merger," said James Condon, of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory. "Instead, we found this black hole fleeing from the larger galaxy and leaving a trail of debris behind it," he added.

"We've not seen anything like this before," Condon said."
Click to expand...
Followed by the ignorant quoting of a deluded person by a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.

Tuxford is some insane crank who believes in "Huge Bang Fantasy" and "merger maniacs" and Pixie of key cannot understand that Tuxford is an insane crank just from those phrases :jaw-dropp!
 
Last edited:
Density of matter external to that space which is expanding or internal to that expanding space? The results would not be the same.

Second, isn't space only known by the presence and distribution of matter? Without matter, there would be no space, correct?
 
Reality Check said:
Not correct. exists even without matter. Cosmologists look at models of universes with no matter. The vacuum solutions to GR are among the first taught to students.
Click to expand...

Can space exist by itself without matter or energy around?

No. Experiments continue to show that there is no 'space' that stands apart from space-time itself...no arena in which matter, energy and gravity operate which is not affected by matter, energy and gravity. General relativity tells us that what we call space is just another feature of the gravitational field of the universe, so space and space-time can and do not exist apart from the matter and energy that creates the gravitational field. This is not speculation, but sound observation.

I haven't posted enough to post URLs
 
ARMCX1 said:
Can space exist by itself without matter or energy around?
Click to expand...
Yes it can.

Vacuum solution (general relativity)
In general relativity, a vacuum solution is a Lorentzian manifold whose Einstein tensor vanishes identically. According to the Einstein field equation, this means that the stress–energy tensor also vanishes identically, so that no matter or non-gravitational fields are present.
Click to expand...

General relativity tells us that space is just part of spacetime. GR tells us that if we have no matter then we still have spacetime and space (see above).

We cannot do experiments in a universe containing matter to see if a universe with no matter has no space.

If you have a credible source listing the experiments and/or observations that show that that space in GR does not exist when there is no matter, you can post it as text rather than a URL, e.g. "this . is . a . url . com".
 
Last edited:
A pulsar and white dwarf dance together in a surprising orbit

http://m.phys.org/news/2016-11-pulsar-white-dwarf-orbit.html


"As history has taught us, understanding the universe requires a serious commitment to the process of continuous discovery. And the more we discover, the stranger it seems to become, forcing us to reconsider what we think we know about it."

Pulling force and curving space dont exist.

love
1038
:)
 
Researcher presents work to understand formation of the universe

http://m.phys.org/news/2016-11-formation-universe.html

"A Manchester-based astrophysicist has Presented research at a major international conference Which is expected to Provide scientists with valuable insights into the behavior of gravity in the early stages of the universe, Allowing them to better understand the forces That created it."

First of all, there is only one force and no one has ever created, or even that is not born hocus pocus.

Movement / Energy / pushing force which now exists, has always existed in one form or another.

So you can forget about created forces.

love
1038
:)
 
On the brink of a scientific revolution

"Gravity is in dire need of new approaches like the one by Verlinde, since it doesn't combine well with quantum physics. Both theories, crown jewels of 20th century physics, cannot be true at the same time. The problems arise in extreme conditions: near black holes, or during the Big Bang. Verlinde says, "Many theoretical physicists like me are working on a revision of the theory, and some major advancements have been made. We might be standing on the brink of a new scientific revolution that will radically change our views on the very nature of space, time and gravity.""

http://m.phys.org/news/2016-11-theory-gravity-dark.html

Picture of universe is going to change so totally way, that you can not understund that!

Love
1038
:)
 
Pixie of key: Usual lies (gravity actaully pulls and GR works)

Pixie of key said:
A pulsar and white dwarf dance together in a surprising orbit

http://m.phys.org/news/2016-11-pulsar-white-dwarf-orbit.html


"As history has taught us, understanding the universe requires a serious commitment to the process of continuous discovery. And the more we discover, the stranger it seems to become, forcing us to reconsider what we think we know about it."
Click to expand...
Gravity pulls + GR works with a curved spacetime thus lies from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.
 
Pixie of key fantasizes about science - item 131

Pixie of key said:
Researcher presents work to understand formation of the universe

http://m.phys.org/news/2016-11-formation-universe.html

"A Manchester-based astrophysicist has Presented research at a major international conference Which is expected to Provide scientists with valuable insights into the behavior of gravity in the early stages of the universe, Allowing them to better understand the forces That created it."
Click to expand...
Followed by usual gibberish from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.
 
Pixie of key fantasizes about science - item 132

Pixie of key said:
On the brink of a scientific revolution

"Gravity is in dire need of new approaches like the one by Verlinde, since it doesn't combine well with quantum physics. Both theories, crown jewels of 20th century physics, cannot be true at the same time. The problems arise in extreme conditions: near black holes, or during the Big Bang. Verlinde says, "Many theoretical physicists like me are working on a revision of the theory, and some major advancements have been made. We might be standing on the brink of a new scientific revolution that will radically change our views on the very nature of space, time and gravity.""

http://m.phys.org/news/2016-11-theory-gravity-dark.html
Click to expand...
Followed by a lie from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos about New theory of gravity might explain dark matter

The picture of the universe will remain the same - gravity pulls, curved spacetime exists because GR works, the evidence for a Big Bang is overwhelming, etc.

What has been known for over 30 years is that it is possible that we can explain dark matter by modifying Newtonian mechanics or GR. This is yet another attempt to do a similar thing. Here gravity (and curved spacetime) emerges from an underlying structure: Entropic gravity
 
Last edited:
Pixie of key said:
...

"As history has taught us, understanding the universe requires a serious commitment to the process of continuous discovery. And the more we discover, the stranger it seems to become, forcing us to reconsider what we think we know about it."
Click to expand...

Actually, the first requirement is a serious study of physics and mathematics followed by an exploration of scientifically based cosmology. This generally requires many years of dedication and hard work. How much have you done?
 
Reality Check said:
Gravity pulls + GR works with a curved spacetime thus lies from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.
Click to expand...
Plus an extra, bonus lie from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos.
A pulsar and white dwarf dance together in a surprising orbit
Last, they considered the possibility that some of the material released from the white dwarf in the past (due to this same stellar wind) could have formed a short-lived circumbinary disk. This disk would then act like a third body, disturbing the system and increasing the eccentricity of the white dwarf's orbit. In the end, they deemed that the first two scenarios were unlikely, since the mass inferred for the pulsar progenitor was not consistent with either model.

However, the third scenario, in which interaction with a circumbinary disk was responsible for the eccentricity, was consistent with their inferred parameters. What's more, the third scenario predicts how (within a certain mass range) that there should be no circular binaries with similar orbital periods – which is consistent with all known examples of such systems.
Click to expand...
This is gravity pulling as we have observed gravity pulling for 400 years.
 
"Searching the universe for strange new star systems can lead to some pretty interesting finds. And sometimes, it can turn up phenomena that contradict everything we think we know about the formation and evolution of stars. Such finds are not only fascinating and exciting, they allow us the chance to expand and refine our models of how the universe came to be."

http://m.phys.org/news/2016-11-pulsar-white-dwarf-orbit.html





Tuxford - 22 hours ago
"Given the mass of this star, this would take about 100 billion years to happen on its own – i.e. longer than the age of the universe.

And no self-respecting Merger Maniac dare suggest that the age of the universe might be longer than that allowed by the Huge Bang Fantasy. Long live the fantasy!"


http://m.phys.org/comments/397817172/


Rakkautta
1038
:)
 
"In 2009, applied physicist Peter Sturrock was visiting the National Solar Observatory in Tucson, Arizona, when the deputy director of the observatory told him they shouldnt read a Controversial article about radioactive decay. Although the subject was outside Sturrock's field, it inspired a thought That intriguing so the next day they phoned the author of the study, Purdue University physicist Ephraim Fischbach, to suggest a collaboration.

Fischbach replied, "We were about to phone you."

More than seven years later, That collaboration could result in an inexpensive tabletop device to detect the elusive neutrinos more efficiently and inexpensively than is currently possible, and could simplify scientists' Ability to study the inner workings of the sun. The work was published in the Nov. 7 issue of the Solar Physics.

"If we're correct, it means That neutrinos are far Easier to detect than people have thought," said Sturrock, professor emeritus of applied physics. "Everyone thought That it would be Necessary to have huge experiments, with thousands of tons of water or other material, That May Involve huge consortia and huge expense, and you might get a few thousand counts a year. But we apr get similar or even better data from an experiment Involving only Micrograms of radioactive material. ""

http://m.phys.org/news/2016-11-solar-physicists-easier-peculiar-particles.html#jCp

Right, so then!

Expanding the neutrino has an internal structure and, therefore, the internal motion / energy / time / pressure.

and what is the internal pressure can be get in? After all, it is precisely a condensation may expand to expand out onto the existing space.

Expanding neutrinos is possible to get us energy. But should be suitable for the "bait" that is placed to protrude toward the Sun so that they are pushed to expand the neutrinos inside and so they could get to expand faster than normal, etc.

hmm, might be worthwhile to take them to the energy at night, or in such a way that they would continue after away from the center of the Earth, rather than toward the center.

love

1038

:)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom